PERFORMANCE FOOD vs US Foods — Government Contracts Comparison

PERFORMANCE FOOD

162 contracts

VS

US Foods

7,030 contracts

Side-by-side comparison of government contract activity, agency reach, and market coverage.

7,192 contracts combined921 agencies combined

Compare any two government vendors

Contract history, agency relationships, and the pre-RFP signals behind both PERFORMANCE FOOD and US Foods.

Get started free

Create a free account · no credit card

Trusted by 200+ enterprise customers and 1,000+ teams on the free plan

Motive logo
Veritone logo
TerraCycle logo
Cyvl logo
WithersRavenel logo
Derivita logo
Comcate logo
SafeTouch logo
IANS Research logo
Motive logo
Veritone logo
TerraCycle logo
Cyvl logo
WithersRavenel logo
Derivita logo
Comcate logo
SafeTouch logo
IANS Research logo
Motive logo
Veritone logo
TerraCycle logo
Cyvl logo
WithersRavenel logo
Derivita logo
Comcate logo
SafeTouch logo
IANS Research logo
Motive logo
Veritone logo
TerraCycle logo
Cyvl logo
WithersRavenel logo
Derivita logo
Comcate logo
SafeTouch logo
IANS Research logo

Head-to-Head

PERFORMANCE FOOD vs US Foods

Relative comparison across 6 key government procurement dimensions.

55
Points
72
Points

Detailed Stats

Side-by-Side Numbers

Raw metrics for each vendor across all tracked dimensions.

Metric
PERFORMANCE FOOD
US Foods
Total Contracts
162
7,030✓
Total Contract Value
$6.1M✓
$726K
Agencies Served
41
880✓
States Active
12
46✓
Sectors Covered
17
98✓
Product Categories
13✓
0

Advantages

Where Each Vendor Leads

Auto-generated comparison based on contract data.

Why is PERFORMANCE FOOD better?

Higher total contract value

$6.1M vs $726K

Broader product categories

13 vs 0 categories

Why is US Foods better?

4240% more contracts

7,030 vs 162

839 more agencies served

880 vs 41

Active in 34 more states

46 vs 12

More diverse sector coverage

98 vs 17 sectors

Frequently Asked Questions

PERFORMANCE FOOD vs US Foods: Government Contracts Comparison

How does PERFORMANCE FOOD compare to US Foods for government contracts?

PERFORMANCE FOOD has 162 government contracts valued at $6.1M, while US Foods has 7,030 contracts valued at $726K. By contract volume, US Foods leads. By total contract value, PERFORMANCE FOOD leads. Both vendors serve state and local government agencies across multiple states.

Which has more government contracts, PERFORMANCE FOOD or US Foods?

US Foods has 7,030 government contracts compared to PERFORMANCE FOOD's 162. However, contract count alone doesn't tell the full story — contract values, agency diversity, and sector coverage all factor into evaluating a vendor's government market presence. Civic IQ provides detailed side-by-side analysis across all dimensions.

Does PERFORMANCE FOOD or US Foods serve more government agencies?

PERFORMANCE FOOD serves 41 government agencies, while US Foods serves 880. US Foods has broader agency reach. The two vendors share 5 agency clients in common, creating direct competitive overlap. Agency reach is a key indicator of a vendor's ability to navigate government procurement processes.

In which states is PERFORMANCE FOOD active vs US Foods?

PERFORMANCE FOOD operates in 12 states, while US Foods covers 46 states. US Foods has broader geographic coverage. Geographic footprint matters for agencies evaluating vendors with regional experience and for vendors assessing competitive landscapes in specific markets.

What sectors do PERFORMANCE FOOD and US Foods compete in?

Between them, PERFORMANCE FOOD and US Foods cover 7 government procurement sectors. They directly compete in FOOD_SERVICES, Product, and SUPPLIES. PERFORMANCE FOOD's top sectors include FOOD_SERVICES, Product, and SUPPLIES, while US Foods focuses on FOOD_SERVICES, SUPPLIES, and Product.

Do PERFORMANCE FOOD and US Foods share any government agency clients?

Yes, PERFORMANCE FOOD and US Foods share 5 government agency clients, including Colman-Egan School District 50-5 (SD), Sherrard CUSD 200 (IL), Red Rock Central School District (MN), DeSmet Elementary School District (MT), and Mercer County Community College (NJ). Shared clients represent direct competitive overlap — tracking which agencies work with both vendors helps you understand switching patterns, contract renewal timing, and competitive displacement opportunities.

Work at a public agency?

Research this vendor's full contract history, pricing, and peer agencies. Free for government.

Get free government access

Bring us your territory.
We'll show you what is forming.

B2G and SLED sales intelligence. Surface government procurement signals from 100,000+ state, local, and education agencies months before the RFP.

Try Civic IQ for free