Side-by-side comparison of government contract activity, agency reach, and market coverage.
Compare any two government vendors
Contract history, agency relationships, and the pre-RFP signals behind both MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY and UCM.
Trusted by 200+ enterprise customers and 1,000+ teams on the free plan
Head-to-Head
Relative comparison across 6 key government procurement dimensions.
Detailed Stats
Raw metrics for each vendor across all tracked dimensions.
Advantages
Auto-generated comparison based on contract data.
14 more agencies served
76 vs 62
Active in 2 more states
13 vs 11
Broader product categories
8 vs 2 categories
10% more contracts
207 vs 188
Higher total contract value
$13.0M vs $890K
More diverse sector coverage
23 vs 22 sectors
Frequently Asked Questions
MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY has 188 government contracts valued at $890K, while UCM has 207 contracts valued at $13.0M. By contract volume, UCM leads. By total contract value, UCM leads. Both vendors serve state and local government agencies across multiple states.
UCM has 207 government contracts compared to MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY's 188. However, contract count alone doesn't tell the full story — contract values, agency diversity, and sector coverage all factor into evaluating a vendor's government market presence. Civic IQ provides detailed side-by-side analysis across all dimensions.
MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY serves 76 government agencies, while UCM serves 62. MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY has broader agency reach. The two vendors share 1 agency clients in common, creating direct competitive overlap. Agency reach is a key indicator of a vendor's ability to navigate government procurement processes.
MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY operates in 13 states, while UCM covers 11 states. MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY has broader geographic coverage. Geographic footprint matters for agencies evaluating vendors with regional experience and for vendors assessing competitive landscapes in specific markets.
Between them, MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY and UCM cover 8 government procurement sectors. They directly compete in PROFESSIONAL_SERVICES, and OTHER. MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY's top sectors include PROFESSIONAL_SERVICES, OTHER, and Service, while UCM focuses on PROFESSIONAL_SERVICES, CONSTRUCTION, and OTHER.
Yes, MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY and UCM share 1 government agency clients, including Knob Noster R-VIII School District (MO). Shared clients represent direct competitive overlap — tracking which agencies work with both vendors helps you understand switching patterns, contract renewal timing, and competitive displacement opportunities.
Research this vendor's full contract history, pricing, and peer agencies. Free for government.
B2G and SLED sales intelligence. Surface government procurement signals from 100,000+ state, local, and education agencies months before the RFP.