Magic Touch Construction vs STEAM MANAGEMENT — Government Contracts Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of government contract activity, agency reach, and market coverage.
Compare any two government vendors
Contract history, agency relationships, and the pre-RFP signals behind both Magic Touch Construction and STEAM MANAGEMENT.
Trusted by 200+ enterprise customers and 1,000+ teams on the free plan
Head-to-Head
Magic Touch Construction vs STEAM MANAGEMENT
Relative comparison across 6 key government procurement dimensions.
Detailed Stats
Side-by-Side Numbers
Raw metrics for each vendor across all tracked dimensions.
Advantages
Where Each Vendor Leads
Auto-generated comparison based on contract data.
Why is Magic Touch Construction better?
4080% more contracts
418 vs 10
Higher total contract value
$8.1M vs $150K
99 more agencies served
104 vs 5
Active in 8 more states
10 vs 2
More diverse sector coverage
46 vs 5 sectors
Why is STEAM MANAGEMENT better?
Broader product categories
1 vs 0 categories
Frequently Asked Questions
Magic Touch Construction vs STEAM MANAGEMENT: Government Contracts Comparison
How does Magic Touch Construction compare to STEAM MANAGEMENT for government contracts?
Magic Touch Construction has 418 government contracts valued at $8.1M, while STEAM MANAGEMENT has 10 contracts valued at $150K. By contract volume, Magic Touch Construction leads. By total contract value, Magic Touch Construction leads. Both vendors serve state and local government agencies across multiple states.
Which has more government contracts, Magic Touch Construction or STEAM MANAGEMENT?
Magic Touch Construction has 418 government contracts compared to STEAM MANAGEMENT's 10. However, contract count alone doesn't tell the full story — contract values, agency diversity, and sector coverage all factor into evaluating a vendor's government market presence. Civic IQ provides detailed side-by-side analysis across all dimensions.
Does Magic Touch Construction or STEAM MANAGEMENT serve more government agencies?
Magic Touch Construction serves 104 government agencies, while STEAM MANAGEMENT serves 5. Magic Touch Construction has broader agency reach. Agency reach is a key indicator of a vendor's ability to navigate government procurement processes.
In which states is Magic Touch Construction active vs STEAM MANAGEMENT?
Magic Touch Construction operates in 10 states, while STEAM MANAGEMENT covers 2 states. Magic Touch Construction has broader geographic coverage. Geographic footprint matters for agencies evaluating vendors with regional experience and for vendors assessing competitive landscapes in specific markets.
What sectors do Magic Touch Construction and STEAM MANAGEMENT compete in?
Between them, Magic Touch Construction and STEAM MANAGEMENT cover 9 government procurement sectors. They directly compete in Service. Magic Touch Construction's top sectors include CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE, and Construction, while STEAM MANAGEMENT focuses on Service, Agreement, and Energy Efficiency Program.
Work at a public agency?
Research this vendor's full contract history, pricing, and peer agencies. Free for government.
Bring us your territory.
We'll show you what is forming.
B2G and SLED sales intelligence. Surface government procurement signals from 100,000+ state, local, and education agencies months before the RFP.