MACC vs MN SOIL HEALTH COALITION — Government Contracts Comparison

MACC

357 contracts

VS

Side-by-side comparison of government contract activity, agency reach, and market coverage.

370 contracts combined151 agencies combined

Compare any two government vendors

Contract history, agency relationships, and the pre-RFP signals behind both MACC and MN SOIL HEALTH COALITION.

Get started free

Create a free account · no credit card

Trusted by 200+ enterprise customers and 1,000+ teams on the free plan

Motive logo
Veritone logo
TerraCycle logo
Cyvl logo
WithersRavenel logo
Derivita logo
Comcate logo
SafeTouch logo
IANS Research logo
Motive logo
Veritone logo
TerraCycle logo
Cyvl logo
WithersRavenel logo
Derivita logo
Comcate logo
SafeTouch logo
IANS Research logo
Motive logo
Veritone logo
TerraCycle logo
Cyvl logo
WithersRavenel logo
Derivita logo
Comcate logo
SafeTouch logo
IANS Research logo
Motive logo
Veritone logo
TerraCycle logo
Cyvl logo
WithersRavenel logo
Derivita logo
Comcate logo
SafeTouch logo
IANS Research logo

Head-to-Head

MACC vs MN SOIL HEALTH COALITION

Relative comparison across 6 key government procurement dimensions.

97
Points
36
Points

Detailed Stats

Side-by-Side Numbers

Raw metrics for each vendor across all tracked dimensions.

Metric
MACC
MN SOIL HEALTH COALITION
Total Contracts
357✓
13
Total Contract Value
$155K
$250K✓
Agencies Served
146✓
5
States Active
21✓
1
Sectors Covered
14✓
4
Product Categories
17✓
0

Advantages

Where Each Vendor Leads

Auto-generated comparison based on contract data.

Why is MACC better?

2646% more contracts

357 vs 13

141 more agencies served

146 vs 5

Active in 20 more states

21 vs 1

More diverse sector coverage

14 vs 4 sectors

Broader product categories

17 vs 0 categories

Why is MN SOIL HEALTH COALITION better?

Higher total contract value

$250K vs $155K

Frequently Asked Questions

MACC vs MN SOIL HEALTH COALITION: Government Contracts Comparison

How does MACC compare to MN SOIL HEALTH COALITION for government contracts?

MACC has 357 government contracts valued at $155K, while MN SOIL HEALTH COALITION has 13 contracts valued at $250K. By contract volume, MACC leads. By total contract value, MN SOIL HEALTH COALITION leads. Both vendors serve state and local government agencies across multiple states.

Which has more government contracts, MACC or MN SOIL HEALTH COALITION?

MACC has 357 government contracts compared to MN SOIL HEALTH COALITION's 13. However, contract count alone doesn't tell the full story — contract values, agency diversity, and sector coverage all factor into evaluating a vendor's government market presence. Civic IQ provides detailed side-by-side analysis across all dimensions.

Does MACC or MN SOIL HEALTH COALITION serve more government agencies?

MACC serves 146 government agencies, while MN SOIL HEALTH COALITION serves 5. MACC has broader agency reach. Agency reach is a key indicator of a vendor's ability to navigate government procurement processes.

In which states is MACC active vs MN SOIL HEALTH COALITION?

MACC operates in 21 states, while MN SOIL HEALTH COALITION covers 1 states. MACC has broader geographic coverage. Geographic footprint matters for agencies evaluating vendors with regional experience and for vendors assessing competitive landscapes in specific markets.

What sectors do MACC and MN SOIL HEALTH COALITION compete in?

Between them, MACC and MN SOIL HEALTH COALITION cover 8 government procurement sectors. They directly compete in OTHER. MACC's top sectors include OTHER, PROFESSIONAL_SERVICES, and TECHNOLOGY, while MN SOIL HEALTH COALITION focuses on OTHER, Grant, and Membership Renewal.

Work at a public agency?

Research this vendor's full contract history, pricing, and peer agencies. Free for government.

Get free government access

Bring us your territory.
We'll show you what is forming.

B2G and SLED sales intelligence. Surface government procurement signals from 100,000+ state, local, and education agencies months before the RFP.

Try Civic IQ for free