LMP vs Yellowstone Landscape — Government Contracts Comparison

LMP

1,376 contracts

VS

Yellowstone Landscape

2,687 contracts

Side-by-side comparison of government contract activity, agency reach, and market coverage.

4,063 contracts combined322 agencies combined

Compare any two government vendors

Contract history, agency relationships, and the pre-RFP signals behind both LMP and Yellowstone Landscape.

Get started free

Create a free account · no credit card

Trusted by 200+ enterprise customers and 1,000+ teams on the free plan

Motive logo
Veritone logo
TerraCycle logo
Cyvl logo
WithersRavenel logo
Derivita logo
Comcate logo
SafeTouch logo
IANS Research logo
Motive logo
Veritone logo
TerraCycle logo
Cyvl logo
WithersRavenel logo
Derivita logo
Comcate logo
SafeTouch logo
IANS Research logo
Motive logo
Veritone logo
TerraCycle logo
Cyvl logo
WithersRavenel logo
Derivita logo
Comcate logo
SafeTouch logo
IANS Research logo
Motive logo
Veritone logo
TerraCycle logo
Cyvl logo
WithersRavenel logo
Derivita logo
Comcate logo
SafeTouch logo
IANS Research logo

Head-to-Head

LMP vs Yellowstone Landscape

Relative comparison across 6 key government procurement dimensions.

61
Points
92
Points

Detailed Stats

Side-by-Side Numbers

Raw metrics for each vendor across all tracked dimensions.

Metric
LMP
Yellowstone Landscape
Total Contracts
1,376
2,687✓
Total Contract Value
$1.3M
$1.3M✓
Agencies Served
30
292✓
States Active
1
22✓
Sectors Covered
11
73✓
Product Categories
7✓
2

Advantages

Where Each Vendor Leads

Auto-generated comparison based on contract data.

Why is LMP better?

Broader product categories

7 vs 2 categories

Why is Yellowstone Landscape better?

95% more contracts

2,687 vs 1,376

Higher total contract value

$1.3M vs $1.3M

262 more agencies served

292 vs 30

Active in 21 more states

22 vs 1

More diverse sector coverage

73 vs 11 sectors

Frequently Asked Questions

LMP vs Yellowstone Landscape: Government Contracts Comparison

How does LMP compare to Yellowstone Landscape for government contracts?

LMP has 1,376 government contracts valued at $1.3M, while Yellowstone Landscape has 2,687 contracts valued at $1.3M. By contract volume, Yellowstone Landscape leads. By total contract value, Yellowstone Landscape leads. Both vendors serve state and local government agencies across multiple states.

Which has more government contracts, LMP or Yellowstone Landscape?

Yellowstone Landscape has 2,687 government contracts compared to LMP's 1,376. However, contract count alone doesn't tell the full story — contract values, agency diversity, and sector coverage all factor into evaluating a vendor's government market presence. Civic IQ provides detailed side-by-side analysis across all dimensions.

Does LMP or Yellowstone Landscape serve more government agencies?

LMP serves 30 government agencies, while Yellowstone Landscape serves 292. Yellowstone Landscape has broader agency reach. The two vendors share 10 agency clients in common, creating direct competitive overlap. Agency reach is a key indicator of a vendor's ability to navigate government procurement processes.

In which states is LMP active vs Yellowstone Landscape?

LMP operates in 1 states, while Yellowstone Landscape covers 22 states. Yellowstone Landscape has broader geographic coverage. Geographic footprint matters for agencies evaluating vendors with regional experience and for vendors assessing competitive landscapes in specific markets.

What sectors do LMP and Yellowstone Landscape compete in?

Between them, LMP and Yellowstone Landscape cover 7 government procurement sectors. They directly compete in MAINTENANCE, FACILITIES, and CONSTRUCTION. LMP's top sectors include MAINTENANCE, FACILITIES, and SUPPLIES, while Yellowstone Landscape focuses on MAINTENANCE, Service, and FACILITIES.

Do LMP and Yellowstone Landscape share any government agency clients?

Yes, LMP and Yellowstone Landscape share 10 government agency clients, including Preserve At South Branch Community Development District (FL), Connerton West Community Development District (FL), Waterset North Community Development District (FL), Panther Trace II CDD (FL), and Lexington Oaks Community Development District (FL). Shared clients represent direct competitive overlap — tracking which agencies work with both vendors helps you understand switching patterns, contract renewal timing, and competitive displacement opportunities.

Work at a public agency?

Research this vendor's full contract history, pricing, and peer agencies. Free for government.

Get free government access

Bring us your territory.
We'll show you what is forming.

B2G and SLED sales intelligence. Surface government procurement signals from 100,000+ state, local, and education agencies months before the RFP.

Try Civic IQ for free