HAMMOND CONSTRUCTION vs WRIGHT — Government Contracts Comparison

VS

WRIGHT

231 contracts

Side-by-side comparison of government contract activity, agency reach, and market coverage.

716 contracts combined165 agencies combined

Compare any two government vendors

Contract history, agency relationships, and the pre-RFP signals behind both HAMMOND CONSTRUCTION and WRIGHT.

Get started free

Create a free account · no credit card

Trusted by 200+ enterprise customers and 1,000+ teams on the free plan

Motive logo
Veritone logo
TerraCycle logo
Cyvl logo
WithersRavenel logo
Derivita logo
Comcate logo
SafeTouch logo
IANS Research logo
Motive logo
Veritone logo
TerraCycle logo
Cyvl logo
WithersRavenel logo
Derivita logo
Comcate logo
SafeTouch logo
IANS Research logo
Motive logo
Veritone logo
TerraCycle logo
Cyvl logo
WithersRavenel logo
Derivita logo
Comcate logo
SafeTouch logo
IANS Research logo
Motive logo
Veritone logo
TerraCycle logo
Cyvl logo
WithersRavenel logo
Derivita logo
Comcate logo
SafeTouch logo
IANS Research logo

Head-to-Head

HAMMOND CONSTRUCTION vs WRIGHT

Relative comparison across 6 key government procurement dimensions.

71
Points
83
Points

Detailed Stats

Side-by-Side Numbers

Raw metrics for each vendor across all tracked dimensions.

Metric
HAMMOND CONSTRUCTION
WRIGHT
Total Contracts
485✓
231
Total Contract Value
$68.5M✓
$6.6M
Agencies Served
44
121✓
States Active
5
32✓
Sectors Covered
23
49✓
Product Categories
8
24✓

Advantages

Where Each Vendor Leads

Auto-generated comparison based on contract data.

Why is HAMMOND CONSTRUCTION better?

110% more contracts

485 vs 231

Higher total contract value

$68.5M vs $6.6M

Why is WRIGHT better?

77 more agencies served

121 vs 44

Active in 27 more states

32 vs 5

More diverse sector coverage

49 vs 23 sectors

Broader product categories

24 vs 8 categories

Frequently Asked Questions

HAMMOND CONSTRUCTION vs WRIGHT: Government Contracts Comparison

How does HAMMOND CONSTRUCTION compare to WRIGHT for government contracts?

HAMMOND CONSTRUCTION has 485 government contracts valued at $68.5M, while WRIGHT has 231 contracts valued at $6.6M. By contract volume, HAMMOND CONSTRUCTION leads. By total contract value, HAMMOND CONSTRUCTION leads. Both vendors serve state and local government agencies across multiple states.

Which has more government contracts, HAMMOND CONSTRUCTION or WRIGHT?

HAMMOND CONSTRUCTION has 485 government contracts compared to WRIGHT's 231. However, contract count alone doesn't tell the full story — contract values, agency diversity, and sector coverage all factor into evaluating a vendor's government market presence. Civic IQ provides detailed side-by-side analysis across all dimensions.

Does HAMMOND CONSTRUCTION or WRIGHT serve more government agencies?

HAMMOND CONSTRUCTION serves 44 government agencies, while WRIGHT serves 121. WRIGHT has broader agency reach. Agency reach is a key indicator of a vendor's ability to navigate government procurement processes.

In which states is HAMMOND CONSTRUCTION active vs WRIGHT?

HAMMOND CONSTRUCTION operates in 5 states, while WRIGHT covers 32 states. WRIGHT has broader geographic coverage. Geographic footprint matters for agencies evaluating vendors with regional experience and for vendors assessing competitive landscapes in specific markets.

What sectors do HAMMOND CONSTRUCTION and WRIGHT compete in?

Between them, HAMMOND CONSTRUCTION and WRIGHT cover 8 government procurement sectors. They directly compete in CONSTRUCTION, and Construction. HAMMOND CONSTRUCTION's top sectors include CONSTRUCTION, Construction, and Construction Change Order, while WRIGHT focuses on INSURANCE, CONSTRUCTION, and OTHER.

Work at a public agency?

Research this vendor's full contract history, pricing, and peer agencies. Free for government.

Get free government access

Bring us your territory.
We'll show you what is forming.

B2G and SLED sales intelligence. Surface government procurement signals from 100,000+ state, local, and education agencies months before the RFP.

Try Civic IQ for free