FIELDTURF vs Shaw Sports Turf — Government Contracts Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of government contract activity, agency reach, and market coverage.
Compare any two government vendors
Contract history, agency relationships, and the pre-RFP signals behind both FIELDTURF and Shaw Sports Turf.
Trusted by 200+ enterprise customers and 1,000+ teams on the free plan
Head-to-Head
FIELDTURF vs Shaw Sports Turf
Relative comparison across 6 key government procurement dimensions.
Detailed Stats
Side-by-Side Numbers
Raw metrics for each vendor across all tracked dimensions.
Advantages
Where Each Vendor Leads
Auto-generated comparison based on contract data.
Why is FIELDTURF better?
205% more contracts
737 vs 242
Higher total contract value
$36.5M vs $20.1M
189 more agencies served
295 vs 106
Active in 9 more states
41 vs 32
Broader product categories
13 vs 0 categories
Why is Shaw Sports Turf better?
More diverse sector coverage
37 vs 25 sectors
Frequently Asked Questions
FIELDTURF vs Shaw Sports Turf: Government Contracts Comparison
How does FIELDTURF compare to Shaw Sports Turf for government contracts?
FIELDTURF has 737 government contracts valued at $36.5M, while Shaw Sports Turf has 242 contracts valued at $20.1M. By contract volume, FIELDTURF leads. By total contract value, FIELDTURF leads. Both vendors serve state and local government agencies across multiple states.
Which has more government contracts, FIELDTURF or Shaw Sports Turf?
FIELDTURF has 737 government contracts compared to Shaw Sports Turf's 242. However, contract count alone doesn't tell the full story — contract values, agency diversity, and sector coverage all factor into evaluating a vendor's government market presence. Civic IQ provides detailed side-by-side analysis across all dimensions.
Does FIELDTURF or Shaw Sports Turf serve more government agencies?
FIELDTURF serves 295 government agencies, while Shaw Sports Turf serves 106. FIELDTURF has broader agency reach. The two vendors share 10 agency clients in common, creating direct competitive overlap. Agency reach is a key indicator of a vendor's ability to navigate government procurement processes.
In which states is FIELDTURF active vs Shaw Sports Turf?
FIELDTURF operates in 41 states, while Shaw Sports Turf covers 32 states. FIELDTURF has broader geographic coverage. Geographic footprint matters for agencies evaluating vendors with regional experience and for vendors assessing competitive landscapes in specific markets.
What sectors do FIELDTURF and Shaw Sports Turf compete in?
Between them, FIELDTURF and Shaw Sports Turf cover 6 government procurement sectors. They directly compete in CONSTRUCTION, FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT, and MAINTENANCE. FIELDTURF's top sectors include CONSTRUCTION, FACILITIES, and EQUIPMENT, while Shaw Sports Turf focuses on CONSTRUCTION, FACILITIES, and EQUIPMENT.
Do FIELDTURF and Shaw Sports Turf share any government agency clients?
Yes, FIELDTURF and Shaw Sports Turf share 10 government agency clients, including Lincoln Way CHSD 210 (IL), Pine-Richland SD (PA), Sourcewell (MN), Freeman School District (WA), and Rockwood R-VI School District (MO). Shared clients represent direct competitive overlap — tracking which agencies work with both vendors helps you understand switching patterns, contract renewal timing, and competitive displacement opportunities.
Work at a public agency?
Research this vendor's full contract history, pricing, and peer agencies. Free for government.
Bring us your territory.
We'll show you what is forming.
B2G and SLED sales intelligence. Surface government procurement signals from 100,000+ state, local, and education agencies months before the RFP.