Fieldturf USA Inc vs Shaw Sports Turf — Government Contracts Comparison

Fieldturf USA Inc

2,247 contracts

VS

Shaw Sports Turf

242 contracts

Side-by-side comparison of government contract activity, agency reach, and market coverage.

2,489 contracts combined802 agencies combined

Compare any two government vendors

Contract history, agency relationships, and the pre-RFP signals behind both Fieldturf USA Inc and Shaw Sports Turf.

Get started free

Create a free account · no credit card

Trusted by 200+ enterprise customers and 1,000+ teams on the free plan

Motive logo
Veritone logo
TerraCycle logo
Cyvl logo
WithersRavenel logo
Derivita logo
Comcate logo
SafeTouch logo
IANS Research logo
Motive logo
Veritone logo
TerraCycle logo
Cyvl logo
WithersRavenel logo
Derivita logo
Comcate logo
SafeTouch logo
IANS Research logo
Motive logo
Veritone logo
TerraCycle logo
Cyvl logo
WithersRavenel logo
Derivita logo
Comcate logo
SafeTouch logo
IANS Research logo
Motive logo
Veritone logo
TerraCycle logo
Cyvl logo
WithersRavenel logo
Derivita logo
Comcate logo
SafeTouch logo
IANS Research logo

Head-to-Head

Fieldturf USA Inc vs Shaw Sports Turf

Relative comparison across 6 key government procurement dimensions.

83
Points
50
Points

Detailed Stats

Side-by-Side Numbers

Raw metrics for each vendor across all tracked dimensions.

Metric
Fieldturf USA Inc
Shaw Sports Turf
Total Contracts
2,247✓
242
Total Contract Value
$24.8M✓
$20.1M
Agencies Served
696✓
106
States Active
44✓
32
Sectors Covered
124✓
37
Product Categories
0
0

Advantages

Where Each Vendor Leads

Auto-generated comparison based on contract data.

Why is Fieldturf USA Inc better?

829% more contracts

2,247 vs 242

Higher total contract value

$24.8M vs $20.1M

590 more agencies served

696 vs 106

Active in 12 more states

44 vs 32

More diverse sector coverage

124 vs 37 sectors

Frequently Asked Questions

Fieldturf USA Inc vs Shaw Sports Turf: Government Contracts Comparison

How does Fieldturf USA Inc compare to Shaw Sports Turf for government contracts?

Fieldturf USA Inc has 2,247 government contracts valued at $24.8M, while Shaw Sports Turf has 242 contracts valued at $20.1M. By contract volume, Fieldturf USA Inc leads. By total contract value, Fieldturf USA Inc leads. Both vendors serve state and local government agencies across multiple states.

Which has more government contracts, Fieldturf USA Inc or Shaw Sports Turf?

Fieldturf USA Inc has 2,247 government contracts compared to Shaw Sports Turf's 242. However, contract count alone doesn't tell the full story — contract values, agency diversity, and sector coverage all factor into evaluating a vendor's government market presence. Civic IQ provides detailed side-by-side analysis across all dimensions.

Does Fieldturf USA Inc or Shaw Sports Turf serve more government agencies?

Fieldturf USA Inc serves 696 government agencies, while Shaw Sports Turf serves 106. Fieldturf USA Inc has broader agency reach. The two vendors share 10 agency clients in common, creating direct competitive overlap. Agency reach is a key indicator of a vendor's ability to navigate government procurement processes.

In which states is Fieldturf USA Inc active vs Shaw Sports Turf?

Fieldturf USA Inc operates in 44 states, while Shaw Sports Turf covers 32 states. Fieldturf USA Inc has broader geographic coverage. Geographic footprint matters for agencies evaluating vendors with regional experience and for vendors assessing competitive landscapes in specific markets.

What sectors do Fieldturf USA Inc and Shaw Sports Turf compete in?

Between them, Fieldturf USA Inc and Shaw Sports Turf cover 6 government procurement sectors. They directly compete in CONSTRUCTION, Construction, FACILITIES, and MAINTENANCE. Fieldturf USA Inc's top sectors include CONSTRUCTION, Construction, and FACILITIES, while Shaw Sports Turf focuses on CONSTRUCTION, FACILITIES, and EQUIPMENT.

Do Fieldturf USA Inc and Shaw Sports Turf share any government agency clients?

Yes, Fieldturf USA Inc and Shaw Sports Turf share 10 government agency clients, including Lincoln Way CHSD 210 (IL), Farrell Area SD (PA), City of Richmond (CA), Pine-Richland SD (PA), and Sequoia Career Academy District (CA). Shared clients represent direct competitive overlap — tracking which agencies work with both vendors helps you understand switching patterns, contract renewal timing, and competitive displacement opportunities.

Work at a public agency?

Research this vendor's full contract history, pricing, and peer agencies. Free for government.

Get free government access

Bring us your territory.
We'll show you what is forming.

B2G and SLED sales intelligence. Surface government procurement signals from 100,000+ state, local, and education agencies months before the RFP.

Try Civic IQ for free