FIELD TURF vs Shaw Sports Turf — Government Contracts Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of government contract activity, agency reach, and market coverage.
Compare any two government vendors
Contract history, agency relationships, and the pre-RFP signals behind both FIELD TURF and Shaw Sports Turf.
Trusted by 200+ enterprise customers and 1,000+ teams on the free plan
Head-to-Head
FIELD TURF vs Shaw Sports Turf
Relative comparison across 6 key government procurement dimensions.
Detailed Stats
Side-by-Side Numbers
Raw metrics for each vendor across all tracked dimensions.
Advantages
Where Each Vendor Leads
Auto-generated comparison based on contract data.
Why is FIELD TURF better?
181% more contracts
680 vs 242
Higher total contract value
$27.0M vs $20.1M
176 more agencies served
282 vs 106
Active in 7 more states
39 vs 32
Broader product categories
7 vs 0 categories
Why is Shaw Sports Turf better?
More diverse sector coverage
37 vs 36 sectors
Frequently Asked Questions
FIELD TURF vs Shaw Sports Turf: Government Contracts Comparison
How does FIELD TURF compare to Shaw Sports Turf for government contracts?
FIELD TURF has 680 government contracts valued at $27.0M, while Shaw Sports Turf has 242 contracts valued at $20.1M. By contract volume, FIELD TURF leads. By total contract value, FIELD TURF leads. Both vendors serve state and local government agencies across multiple states.
Which has more government contracts, FIELD TURF or Shaw Sports Turf?
FIELD TURF has 680 government contracts compared to Shaw Sports Turf's 242. However, contract count alone doesn't tell the full story — contract values, agency diversity, and sector coverage all factor into evaluating a vendor's government market presence. Civic IQ provides detailed side-by-side analysis across all dimensions.
Does FIELD TURF or Shaw Sports Turf serve more government agencies?
FIELD TURF serves 282 government agencies, while Shaw Sports Turf serves 106. FIELD TURF has broader agency reach. The two vendors share 2 agency clients in common, creating direct competitive overlap. Agency reach is a key indicator of a vendor's ability to navigate government procurement processes.
In which states is FIELD TURF active vs Shaw Sports Turf?
FIELD TURF operates in 39 states, while Shaw Sports Turf covers 32 states. FIELD TURF has broader geographic coverage. Geographic footprint matters for agencies evaluating vendors with regional experience and for vendors assessing competitive landscapes in specific markets.
What sectors do FIELD TURF and Shaw Sports Turf compete in?
Between them, FIELD TURF and Shaw Sports Turf cover 5 government procurement sectors. They directly compete in CONSTRUCTION, FACILITIES, MAINTENANCE, EQUIPMENT, and Construction. FIELD TURF's top sectors include CONSTRUCTION, FACILITIES, and MAINTENANCE, while Shaw Sports Turf focuses on CONSTRUCTION, FACILITIES, and EQUIPMENT.
Do FIELD TURF and Shaw Sports Turf share any government agency clients?
Yes, FIELD TURF and Shaw Sports Turf share 2 government agency clients, including Clairton City SD (PA), and Woodland Community College (CA). Shared clients represent direct competitive overlap — tracking which agencies work with both vendors helps you understand switching patterns, contract renewal timing, and competitive displacement opportunities.
Work at a public agency?
Research this vendor's full contract history, pricing, and peer agencies. Free for government.
Bring us your territory.
We'll show you what is forming.
B2G and SLED sales intelligence. Surface government procurement signals from 100,000+ state, local, and education agencies months before the RFP.