Side-by-side comparison of government contract activity, agency reach, and market coverage.
Compare any two government vendors
Contract history, agency relationships, and the pre-RFP signals behind both ELECTRONIC FEDERAL TAX PAYMENT SYSTEM and Internal Revenue Service.
Trusted by 200+ enterprise customers and 1,000+ teams on the free plan
Head-to-Head
Relative comparison across 6 key government procurement dimensions.
Detailed Stats
Raw metrics for each vendor across all tracked dimensions.
Advantages
Auto-generated comparison based on contract data.
Higher total contract value
$14.8M vs $7.2M
613% more contracts
10,511 vs 1,475
1,214 more agencies served
1,262 vs 48
Active in 33 more states
48 vs 15
More diverse sector coverage
61 vs 3 sectors
Frequently Asked Questions
ELECTRONIC FEDERAL TAX PAYMENT SYSTEM has 1,475 government contracts valued at $14.8M, while Internal Revenue Service has 10,511 contracts valued at $7.2M. By contract volume, Internal Revenue Service leads. By total contract value, ELECTRONIC FEDERAL TAX PAYMENT SYSTEM leads. Both vendors serve state and local government agencies across multiple states.
Internal Revenue Service has 10,511 government contracts compared to ELECTRONIC FEDERAL TAX PAYMENT SYSTEM's 1,475. However, contract count alone doesn't tell the full story — contract values, agency diversity, and sector coverage all factor into evaluating a vendor's government market presence. Civic IQ provides detailed side-by-side analysis across all dimensions.
ELECTRONIC FEDERAL TAX PAYMENT SYSTEM serves 48 government agencies, while Internal Revenue Service serves 1,262. Internal Revenue Service has broader agency reach. The two vendors share 4 agency clients in common, creating direct competitive overlap. Agency reach is a key indicator of a vendor's ability to navigate government procurement processes.
ELECTRONIC FEDERAL TAX PAYMENT SYSTEM operates in 15 states, while Internal Revenue Service covers 48 states. Internal Revenue Service has broader geographic coverage. Geographic footprint matters for agencies evaluating vendors with regional experience and for vendors assessing competitive landscapes in specific markets.
Between them, ELECTRONIC FEDERAL TAX PAYMENT SYSTEM and Internal Revenue Service cover 5 government procurement sectors. They directly compete in FINANCIAL_SERVICES, OTHER, and UTILITIES. ELECTRONIC FEDERAL TAX PAYMENT SYSTEM's top sectors include FINANCIAL_SERVICES, OTHER, and UTILITIES, while Internal Revenue Service focuses on FINANCIAL_SERVICES, OTHER, and Service.
Yes, ELECTRONIC FEDERAL TAX PAYMENT SYSTEM and Internal Revenue Service share 4 government agency clients, including Pine Bush Central School District (NY), Ritenour School District (MO), Preston Joint School District 201 (ID), and Macon County R-I School District (MO). Shared clients represent direct competitive overlap — tracking which agencies work with both vendors helps you understand switching patterns, contract renewal timing, and competitive displacement opportunities.
Research this vendor's full contract history, pricing, and peer agencies. Free for government.
B2G and SLED sales intelligence. Surface government procurement signals from 100,000+ state, local, and education agencies months before the RFP.