Dakota Supply Group vs Magic Touch Construction — Government Contracts Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of government contract activity, agency reach, and market coverage.
Compare any two government vendors
Contract history, agency relationships, and the pre-RFP signals behind both Dakota Supply Group and Magic Touch Construction.
Trusted by 200+ enterprise customers and 1,000+ teams on the free plan
Head-to-Head
Dakota Supply Group vs Magic Touch Construction
Relative comparison across 6 key government procurement dimensions.
Detailed Stats
Side-by-Side Numbers
Raw metrics for each vendor across all tracked dimensions.
Advantages
Where Each Vendor Leads
Auto-generated comparison based on contract data.
Why is Dakota Supply Group better?
729% more contracts
3,467 vs 418
490 more agencies served
594 vs 104
Active in 10 more states
20 vs 10
Why is Magic Touch Construction better?
Higher total contract value
$8.1M vs $609K
More diverse sector coverage
46 vs 25 sectors
Frequently Asked Questions
Dakota Supply Group vs Magic Touch Construction: Government Contracts Comparison
How does Dakota Supply Group compare to Magic Touch Construction for government contracts?
Dakota Supply Group has 3,467 government contracts valued at $609K, while Magic Touch Construction has 418 contracts valued at $8.1M. By contract volume, Dakota Supply Group leads. By total contract value, Magic Touch Construction leads. Both vendors serve state and local government agencies across multiple states.
Which has more government contracts, Dakota Supply Group or Magic Touch Construction?
Dakota Supply Group has 3,467 government contracts compared to Magic Touch Construction's 418. However, contract count alone doesn't tell the full story — contract values, agency diversity, and sector coverage all factor into evaluating a vendor's government market presence. Civic IQ provides detailed side-by-side analysis across all dimensions.
Does Dakota Supply Group or Magic Touch Construction serve more government agencies?
Dakota Supply Group serves 594 government agencies, while Magic Touch Construction serves 104. Dakota Supply Group has broader agency reach. Agency reach is a key indicator of a vendor's ability to navigate government procurement processes.
In which states is Dakota Supply Group active vs Magic Touch Construction?
Dakota Supply Group operates in 20 states, while Magic Touch Construction covers 10 states. Dakota Supply Group has broader geographic coverage. Geographic footprint matters for agencies evaluating vendors with regional experience and for vendors assessing competitive landscapes in specific markets.
What sectors do Dakota Supply Group and Magic Touch Construction compete in?
Between them, Dakota Supply Group and Magic Touch Construction cover 9 government procurement sectors. They directly compete in MAINTENANCE. Dakota Supply Group's top sectors include SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT, and MAINTENANCE, while Magic Touch Construction focuses on CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE, and Construction.
Work at a public agency?
Research this vendor's full contract history, pricing, and peer agencies. Free for government.
Bring us your territory.
We'll show you what is forming.
B2G and SLED sales intelligence. Surface government procurement signals from 100,000+ state, local, and education agencies months before the RFP.