CONCRETE TECHNOLOGIES INC vs Construct Inc — Government Contracts Comparison

VS

Construct Inc

268 contracts

Side-by-side comparison of government contract activity, agency reach, and market coverage.

408 contracts combined50 agencies combined

Compare any two government vendors

Contract history, agency relationships, and the pre-RFP signals behind both CONCRETE TECHNOLOGIES INC and Construct Inc.

Get started free

Create a free account · no credit card

Trusted by 200+ enterprise customers and 1,000+ teams on the free plan

Motive logo
Veritone logo
TerraCycle logo
Cyvl logo
WithersRavenel logo
Derivita logo
Comcate logo
SafeTouch logo
IANS Research logo
Motive logo
Veritone logo
TerraCycle logo
Cyvl logo
WithersRavenel logo
Derivita logo
Comcate logo
SafeTouch logo
IANS Research logo
Motive logo
Veritone logo
TerraCycle logo
Cyvl logo
WithersRavenel logo
Derivita logo
Comcate logo
SafeTouch logo
IANS Research logo
Motive logo
Veritone logo
TerraCycle logo
Cyvl logo
WithersRavenel logo
Derivita logo
Comcate logo
SafeTouch logo
IANS Research logo

Head-to-Head

CONCRETE TECHNOLOGIES INC vs Construct Inc

Relative comparison across 6 key government procurement dimensions.

58
Points
77
Points

Detailed Stats

Side-by-Side Numbers

Raw metrics for each vendor across all tracked dimensions.

Metric
CONCRETE TECHNOLOGIES INC
Construct Inc
Total Contracts
140
268✓
Total Contract Value
$55.8M✓
$20.6M
Agencies Served
15
35✓
States Active
2
5✓
Sectors Covered
2
10✓
Product Categories
0
0

Advantages

Where Each Vendor Leads

Auto-generated comparison based on contract data.

Why is CONCRETE TECHNOLOGIES INC better?

Higher total contract value

$55.8M vs $20.6M

Why is Construct Inc better?

91% more contracts

268 vs 140

20 more agencies served

35 vs 15

Active in 3 more states

5 vs 2

More diverse sector coverage

10 vs 2 sectors

Frequently Asked Questions

CONCRETE TECHNOLOGIES INC vs Construct Inc: Government Contracts Comparison

How does CONCRETE TECHNOLOGIES INC compare to Construct Inc for government contracts?

CONCRETE TECHNOLOGIES INC has 140 government contracts valued at $55.8M, while Construct Inc has 268 contracts valued at $20.6M. By contract volume, Construct Inc leads. By total contract value, CONCRETE TECHNOLOGIES INC leads. Both vendors serve state and local government agencies across multiple states.

Which has more government contracts, CONCRETE TECHNOLOGIES INC or Construct Inc?

Construct Inc has 268 government contracts compared to CONCRETE TECHNOLOGIES INC's 140. However, contract count alone doesn't tell the full story — contract values, agency diversity, and sector coverage all factor into evaluating a vendor's government market presence. Civic IQ provides detailed side-by-side analysis across all dimensions.

Does CONCRETE TECHNOLOGIES INC or Construct Inc serve more government agencies?

CONCRETE TECHNOLOGIES INC serves 15 government agencies, while Construct Inc serves 35. Construct Inc has broader agency reach. The two vendors share 1 agency clients in common, creating direct competitive overlap. Agency reach is a key indicator of a vendor's ability to navigate government procurement processes.

In which states is CONCRETE TECHNOLOGIES INC active vs Construct Inc?

CONCRETE TECHNOLOGIES INC operates in 2 states, while Construct Inc covers 5 states. Construct Inc has broader geographic coverage. Geographic footprint matters for agencies evaluating vendors with regional experience and for vendors assessing competitive landscapes in specific markets.

What sectors do CONCRETE TECHNOLOGIES INC and Construct Inc compete in?

Between them, CONCRETE TECHNOLOGIES INC and Construct Inc cover 6 government procurement sectors. They directly compete in CONSTRUCTION. CONCRETE TECHNOLOGIES INC's top sectors include CONSTRUCTION, and SUPPLIES, while Construct Inc focuses on CONSTRUCTION, OTHER, and Construction.

Do CONCRETE TECHNOLOGIES INC and Construct Inc share any government agency clients?

Yes, CONCRETE TECHNOLOGIES INC and Construct Inc share 1 government agency clients, including City of Ankeny (IA). Shared clients represent direct competitive overlap — tracking which agencies work with both vendors helps you understand switching patterns, contract renewal timing, and competitive displacement opportunities.

Work at a public agency?

Research this vendor's full contract history, pricing, and peer agencies. Free for government.

Get free government access

Bring us your territory.
We'll show you what is forming.

B2G and SLED sales intelligence. Surface government procurement signals from 100,000+ state, local, and education agencies months before the RFP.

Try Civic IQ for free