CONCORD EXCAVATING vs MCDERMOTT EXCAVATING — Government Contracts Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of government contract activity, agency reach, and market coverage.
Compare any two government vendors
Contract history, agency relationships, and the pre-RFP signals behind both CONCORD EXCAVATING and MCDERMOTT EXCAVATING.
Trusted by 200+ enterprise customers and 1,000+ teams on the free plan
Head-to-Head
CONCORD EXCAVATING vs MCDERMOTT EXCAVATING
Relative comparison across 6 key government procurement dimensions.
Detailed Stats
Side-by-Side Numbers
Raw metrics for each vendor across all tracked dimensions.
Advantages
Where Each Vendor Leads
Auto-generated comparison based on contract data.
Why is CONCORD EXCAVATING better?
Higher total contract value
$6.8M vs $6.1M
12 more agencies served
21 vs 9
Active in 5 more states
7 vs 2
More diverse sector coverage
14 vs 8 sectors
Broader product categories
6 vs 0 categories
Why is MCDERMOTT EXCAVATING better?
232% more contracts
196 vs 59
Frequently Asked Questions
CONCORD EXCAVATING vs MCDERMOTT EXCAVATING: Government Contracts Comparison
How does CONCORD EXCAVATING compare to MCDERMOTT EXCAVATING for government contracts?
CONCORD EXCAVATING has 59 government contracts valued at $6.8M, while MCDERMOTT EXCAVATING has 196 contracts valued at $6.1M. By contract volume, MCDERMOTT EXCAVATING leads. By total contract value, CONCORD EXCAVATING leads. Both vendors serve state and local government agencies across multiple states.
Which has more government contracts, CONCORD EXCAVATING or MCDERMOTT EXCAVATING?
MCDERMOTT EXCAVATING has 196 government contracts compared to CONCORD EXCAVATING's 59. However, contract count alone doesn't tell the full story — contract values, agency diversity, and sector coverage all factor into evaluating a vendor's government market presence. Civic IQ provides detailed side-by-side analysis across all dimensions.
Does CONCORD EXCAVATING or MCDERMOTT EXCAVATING serve more government agencies?
CONCORD EXCAVATING serves 21 government agencies, while MCDERMOTT EXCAVATING serves 9. CONCORD EXCAVATING has broader agency reach. Agency reach is a key indicator of a vendor's ability to navigate government procurement processes.
In which states is CONCORD EXCAVATING active vs MCDERMOTT EXCAVATING?
CONCORD EXCAVATING operates in 7 states, while MCDERMOTT EXCAVATING covers 2 states. CONCORD EXCAVATING has broader geographic coverage. Geographic footprint matters for agencies evaluating vendors with regional experience and for vendors assessing competitive landscapes in specific markets.
What sectors do CONCORD EXCAVATING and MCDERMOTT EXCAVATING compete in?
Between them, CONCORD EXCAVATING and MCDERMOTT EXCAVATING cover 7 government procurement sectors. They directly compete in CONSTRUCTION, Construction, and Service. CONCORD EXCAVATING's top sectors include CONSTRUCTION, Construction, and Service, while MCDERMOTT EXCAVATING focuses on CONSTRUCTION, Construction, and Service.
Work at a public agency?
Research this vendor's full contract history, pricing, and peer agencies. Free for government.
Bring us your territory.
We'll show you what is forming.
B2G and SLED sales intelligence. Surface government procurement signals from 100,000+ state, local, and education agencies months before the RFP.