COMMUNITY WASTE DISPOSAL CWD vs WASTE MANAGEMENT OF TEXAS INC — Government Contracts Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of government contract activity, agency reach, and market coverage.
Compare any two government vendors
Contract history, agency relationships, and the pre-RFP signals behind both COMMUNITY WASTE DISPOSAL CWD and WASTE MANAGEMENT OF TEXAS INC.
Trusted by 200+ enterprise customers and 1,000+ teams on the free plan
Head-to-Head
COMMUNITY WASTE DISPOSAL CWD vs WASTE MANAGEMENT OF TEXAS INC
Relative comparison across 6 key government procurement dimensions.
Detailed Stats
Side-by-Side Numbers
Raw metrics for each vendor across all tracked dimensions.
Advantages
Where Each Vendor Leads
Auto-generated comparison based on contract data.
Why is WASTE MANAGEMENT OF TEXAS INC better?
3194% more contracts
527 vs 16
Higher total contract value
$2.1M vs $0
99 more agencies served
107 vs 8
Active in 3 more states
5 vs 2
More diverse sector coverage
47 vs 4 sectors
Broader product categories
4 vs 0 categories
Frequently Asked Questions
COMMUNITY WASTE DISPOSAL CWD vs WASTE MANAGEMENT OF TEXAS INC: Government Contracts Comparison
How does COMMUNITY WASTE DISPOSAL CWD compare to WASTE MANAGEMENT OF TEXAS INC for government contracts?
COMMUNITY WASTE DISPOSAL CWD has 16 government contracts valued at $0, while WASTE MANAGEMENT OF TEXAS INC has 527 contracts valued at $2.1M. By contract volume, WASTE MANAGEMENT OF TEXAS INC leads. By total contract value, WASTE MANAGEMENT OF TEXAS INC leads. Both vendors serve state and local government agencies across multiple states.
Which has more government contracts, COMMUNITY WASTE DISPOSAL CWD or WASTE MANAGEMENT OF TEXAS INC?
WASTE MANAGEMENT OF TEXAS INC has 527 government contracts compared to COMMUNITY WASTE DISPOSAL CWD's 16. However, contract count alone doesn't tell the full story — contract values, agency diversity, and sector coverage all factor into evaluating a vendor's government market presence. Civic IQ provides detailed side-by-side analysis across all dimensions.
Does COMMUNITY WASTE DISPOSAL CWD or WASTE MANAGEMENT OF TEXAS INC serve more government agencies?
COMMUNITY WASTE DISPOSAL CWD serves 8 government agencies, while WASTE MANAGEMENT OF TEXAS INC serves 107. WASTE MANAGEMENT OF TEXAS INC has broader agency reach. The two vendors share 1 agency clients in common, creating direct competitive overlap. Agency reach is a key indicator of a vendor's ability to navigate government procurement processes.
In which states is COMMUNITY WASTE DISPOSAL CWD active vs WASTE MANAGEMENT OF TEXAS INC?
COMMUNITY WASTE DISPOSAL CWD operates in 2 states, while WASTE MANAGEMENT OF TEXAS INC covers 5 states. WASTE MANAGEMENT OF TEXAS INC has broader geographic coverage. Geographic footprint matters for agencies evaluating vendors with regional experience and for vendors assessing competitive landscapes in specific markets.
What sectors do COMMUNITY WASTE DISPOSAL CWD and WASTE MANAGEMENT OF TEXAS INC compete in?
Between them, COMMUNITY WASTE DISPOSAL CWD and WASTE MANAGEMENT OF TEXAS INC cover 5 government procurement sectors. They directly compete in MAINTENANCE, FOOD_SERVICES, OTHER, and FACILITIES. COMMUNITY WASTE DISPOSAL CWD's top sectors include MAINTENANCE, FOOD_SERVICES, and OTHER, while WASTE MANAGEMENT OF TEXAS INC focuses on MAINTENANCE, OTHER, and FACILITIES.
Do COMMUNITY WASTE DISPOSAL CWD and WASTE MANAGEMENT OF TEXAS INC share any government agency clients?
Yes, COMMUNITY WASTE DISPOSAL CWD and WASTE MANAGEMENT OF TEXAS INC share 1 government agency clients, including City of Glenn Heights city (TX). Shared clients represent direct competitive overlap — tracking which agencies work with both vendors helps you understand switching patterns, contract renewal timing, and competitive displacement opportunities.
Work at a public agency?
Research this vendor's full contract history, pricing, and peer agencies. Free for government.
Bring us your territory.
We'll show you what is forming.
B2G and SLED sales intelligence. Surface government procurement signals from 100,000+ state, local, and education agencies months before the RFP.