Side-by-side comparison of government contract activity, agency reach, and market coverage.
Compare any two government vendors
Contract history, agency relationships, and the pre-RFP signals behind both CAT and CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICE.
Trusted by 200+ enterprise customers and 1,000+ teams on the free plan
Head-to-Head
Relative comparison across 6 key government procurement dimensions.
Detailed Stats
Raw metrics for each vendor across all tracked dimensions.
Advantages
Auto-generated comparison based on contract data.
3433% more contracts
1,272 vs 36
Higher total contract value
$3.0M vs $894K
744 more agencies served
759 vs 15
Active in 39 more states
51 vs 12
More diverse sector coverage
15 vs 4 sectors
Broader product categories
3 vs 1 categories
Frequently Asked Questions
CAT has 1,272 government contracts valued at $3.0M, while CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICE has 36 contracts valued at $894K. By contract volume, CAT leads. By total contract value, CAT leads. Both vendors serve state and local government agencies across multiple states.
CAT has 1,272 government contracts compared to CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICE's 36. However, contract count alone doesn't tell the full story — contract values, agency diversity, and sector coverage all factor into evaluating a vendor's government market presence. Civic IQ provides detailed side-by-side analysis across all dimensions.
CAT serves 759 government agencies, while CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICE serves 15. CAT has broader agency reach. The two vendors share 1 agency clients in common, creating direct competitive overlap. Agency reach is a key indicator of a vendor's ability to navigate government procurement processes.
CAT operates in 51 states, while CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICE covers 12 states. CAT has broader geographic coverage. Geographic footprint matters for agencies evaluating vendors with regional experience and for vendors assessing competitive landscapes in specific markets.
Between them, CAT and CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICE cover 8 government procurement sectors. They directly compete in EQUIPMENT. CAT's top sectors include EQUIPMENT, MAINTENANCE, and OTHER, while CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICE focuses on EQUIPMENT, FINANCIAL_SERVICES, and Service.
Yes, CAT and CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICE share 1 government agency clients, including Town of Sweet (SD). Shared clients represent direct competitive overlap — tracking which agencies work with both vendors helps you understand switching patterns, contract renewal timing, and competitive displacement opportunities.
Research this vendor's full contract history, pricing, and peer agencies. Free for government.
B2G and SLED sales intelligence. Surface government procurement signals from 100,000+ state, local, and education agencies months before the RFP.