CARBYNE INC vs MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS — Government Contracts Comparison

CARBYNE INC

58 contracts

VS

MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS

9,364 contracts

Side-by-side comparison of government contract activity, agency reach, and market coverage.

9,422 contracts combined2,780 agencies combined

Compare any two government vendors

Contract history, agency relationships, and the pre-RFP signals behind both CARBYNE INC and MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS.

Get started free

Create a free account · no credit card

Trusted by 200+ enterprise customers and 1,000+ teams on the free plan

Motive logo
Veritone logo
TerraCycle logo
Cyvl logo
WithersRavenel logo
Derivita logo
Comcate logo
SafeTouch logo
IANS Research logo
Motive logo
Veritone logo
TerraCycle logo
Cyvl logo
WithersRavenel logo
Derivita logo
Comcate logo
SafeTouch logo
IANS Research logo
Motive logo
Veritone logo
TerraCycle logo
Cyvl logo
WithersRavenel logo
Derivita logo
Comcate logo
SafeTouch logo
IANS Research logo
Motive logo
Veritone logo
TerraCycle logo
Cyvl logo
WithersRavenel logo
Derivita logo
Comcate logo
SafeTouch logo
IANS Research logo

Head-to-Head

CARBYNE INC vs MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS

Relative comparison across 6 key government procurement dimensions.

22
Points
100
Points

Detailed Stats

Side-by-Side Numbers

Raw metrics for each vendor across all tracked dimensions.

Metric
CARBYNE INC
MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS
Total Contracts
58
9,364✓
Total Contract Value
$4.8M
$15.4M✓
Agencies Served
24
2,756✓
States Active
10
52✓
Sectors Covered
3
120✓
Product Categories
0
26✓

Advantages

Where Each Vendor Leads

Auto-generated comparison based on contract data.

Why is MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS better?

16045% more contracts

9,364 vs 58

Higher total contract value

$15.4M vs $4.8M

2,732 more agencies served

2,756 vs 24

Active in 42 more states

52 vs 10

More diverse sector coverage

120 vs 3 sectors

Broader product categories

26 vs 0 categories

Frequently Asked Questions

CARBYNE INC vs MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS: Government Contracts Comparison

How does CARBYNE INC compare to MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS for government contracts?

CARBYNE INC has 58 government contracts valued at $4.8M, while MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS has 9,364 contracts valued at $15.4M. By contract volume, MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS leads. By total contract value, MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS leads. Both vendors serve state and local government agencies across multiple states.

Which has more government contracts, CARBYNE INC or MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS?

MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS has 9,364 government contracts compared to CARBYNE INC's 58. However, contract count alone doesn't tell the full story — contract values, agency diversity, and sector coverage all factor into evaluating a vendor's government market presence. Civic IQ provides detailed side-by-side analysis across all dimensions.

Does CARBYNE INC or MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS serve more government agencies?

CARBYNE INC serves 24 government agencies, while MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS serves 2,756. MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS has broader agency reach. The two vendors share 5 agency clients in common, creating direct competitive overlap. Agency reach is a key indicator of a vendor's ability to navigate government procurement processes.

In which states is CARBYNE INC active vs MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS?

CARBYNE INC operates in 10 states, while MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS covers 52 states. MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS has broader geographic coverage. Geographic footprint matters for agencies evaluating vendors with regional experience and for vendors assessing competitive landscapes in specific markets.

What sectors do CARBYNE INC and MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS compete in?

Between them, CARBYNE INC and MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS cover 6 government procurement sectors. They directly compete in TECHNOLOGY, and EQUIPMENT. CARBYNE INC's top sectors include TECHNOLOGY, EQUIPMENT, and LICENSE, while MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS focuses on TECHNOLOGY, EQUIPMENT, and MAINTENANCE.

Do CARBYNE INC and MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS share any government agency clients?

Yes, CARBYNE INC and MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS share 5 government agency clients, including Town of Waterford charter (MI), Glenview village (IL), Franklin County (PA), Hidalgo County (TX), and Adams County Transportation Planning Organization (PA). Shared clients represent direct competitive overlap — tracking which agencies work with both vendors helps you understand switching patterns, contract renewal timing, and competitive displacement opportunities.

Work at a public agency?

Research this vendor's full contract history, pricing, and peer agencies. Free for government.

Get free government access

Bring us your territory.
We'll show you what is forming.

B2G and SLED sales intelligence. Surface government procurement signals from 100,000+ state, local, and education agencies months before the RFP.

Try Civic IQ for free