Side-by-side comparison of government contract activity, agency reach, and market coverage.
Trusted by teams at
Head-to-Head
Relative comparison across 6 key government procurement dimensions.
Detailed Stats
Raw metrics for each vendor across all tracked dimensions.
Advantages
Auto-generated comparison based on contract data.
1292% more contracts
362 vs 26
Higher total contract value
$309K vs $161K
142 more agencies served
153 vs 11
Active in 28 more states
36 vs 8
More diverse sector coverage
39 vs 6 sectors
Broader product categories
22 vs 14 categories
Frequently Asked Questions
T MOBILE has 362 government contracts valued at $309K, while T MOBILE USA has 26 contracts valued at $161K. By contract volume, T MOBILE leads. By total contract value, T MOBILE leads. Both vendors serve state and local government agencies across multiple states.
T MOBILE has 362 government contracts compared to T MOBILE USA's 26. However, contract count alone doesn't tell the full story — contract values, agency diversity, and sector coverage all factor into evaluating a vendor's government market presence. Civic IQ provides detailed side-by-side analysis across all dimensions.
T MOBILE serves 153 government agencies, while T MOBILE USA serves 11. T MOBILE has broader agency reach. The two vendors share 1 agency clients in common, creating direct competitive overlap. Agency reach is a key indicator of a vendor's ability to navigate government procurement processes.
T MOBILE operates in 36 states, while T MOBILE USA covers 8 states. T MOBILE has broader geographic coverage. Geographic footprint matters for agencies evaluating vendors with regional experience and for vendors assessing competitive landscapes in specific markets.
Between them, T MOBILE and T MOBILE USA cover 7 government procurement sectors. They directly compete in UTILITIES, OTHER, and Service. T MOBILE's top sectors include UTILITIES, TECHNOLOGY, and OTHER, while T MOBILE USA focuses on Service, UTILITIES, and Services.
Yes, T MOBILE and T MOBILE USA share 1 government agency clients, including City of Glen Cove (NY). Shared clients represent direct competitive overlap — tracking which agencies work with both vendors helps you understand switching patterns, contract renewal timing, and competitive displacement opportunities.
See live SLED buying signals, source docs, decision-makers, contract context, and the next step into your CRM or pipeline.