SUMMIT ENGINEERING vs UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES — Government Contracts Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of government contract activity, agency reach, and market coverage.
Trusted by teams at
Head-to-Head
SUMMIT ENGINEERING vs UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES
Relative comparison across 6 key government procurement dimensions.
Detailed Stats
Side-by-Side Numbers
Raw metrics for each vendor across all tracked dimensions.
Advantages
Where Each Vendor Leads
Auto-generated comparison based on contract data.
Why is SUMMIT ENGINEERING better?
19% more contracts
230 vs 193
Active in 13 more states
20 vs 7
Why is UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES better?
Higher total contract value
$7.6M vs $1.8M
10 more agencies served
74 vs 64
More diverse sector coverage
55 vs 35 sectors
Broader product categories
9 vs 7 categories
Frequently Asked Questions
SUMMIT ENGINEERING vs UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES: Government Contracts Comparison
How does SUMMIT ENGINEERING compare to UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES for government contracts?
SUMMIT ENGINEERING has 230 government contracts valued at $1.8M, while UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES has 193 contracts valued at $7.6M. By contract volume, SUMMIT ENGINEERING leads. By total contract value, UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES leads. Both vendors serve state and local government agencies across multiple states.
Which has more government contracts, SUMMIT ENGINEERING or UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES?
SUMMIT ENGINEERING has 230 government contracts compared to UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES's 193. However, contract count alone doesn't tell the full story — contract values, agency diversity, and sector coverage all factor into evaluating a vendor's government market presence. Civic IQ provides detailed side-by-side analysis across all dimensions.
Does SUMMIT ENGINEERING or UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES serve more government agencies?
SUMMIT ENGINEERING serves 64 government agencies, while UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES serves 74. UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES has broader agency reach. The two vendors share 1 agency clients in common, creating direct competitive overlap. Agency reach is a key indicator of a vendor's ability to navigate government procurement processes.
In which states is SUMMIT ENGINEERING active vs UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES?
SUMMIT ENGINEERING operates in 20 states, while UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES covers 7 states. SUMMIT ENGINEERING has broader geographic coverage. Geographic footprint matters for agencies evaluating vendors with regional experience and for vendors assessing competitive landscapes in specific markets.
What sectors do SUMMIT ENGINEERING and UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES compete in?
Between them, SUMMIT ENGINEERING and UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES cover 7 government procurement sectors. They directly compete in PROFESSIONAL_SERVICES, Service, and Consulting. SUMMIT ENGINEERING's top sectors include PROFESSIONAL_SERVICES, Service, and Engineering, while UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES focuses on PROFESSIONAL_SERVICES, Service, and Professional Services.
Do SUMMIT ENGINEERING and UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES share any government agency clients?
Yes, SUMMIT ENGINEERING and UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES share 1 government agency clients, including City of Apopka (FL). Shared clients represent direct competitive overlap — tracking which agencies work with both vendors helps you understand switching patterns, contract renewal timing, and competitive displacement opportunities.
Bring us your territory.
We'll show you what is forming.
See live SLED buying signals, source docs, decision-makers, contract context, and the next step into your CRM or pipeline.