Side-by-side comparison of government contract activity, agency reach, and market coverage.
Trusted by teams at
Head-to-Head
Relative comparison across 6 key government procurement dimensions.
Detailed Stats
Raw metrics for each vendor across all tracked dimensions.
Advantages
Auto-generated comparison based on contract data.
27950% more contracts
1,683 vs 6
Higher total contract value
$558.0B vs $4K
528 more agencies served
533 vs 5
Active in 45 more states
50 vs 5
More diverse sector coverage
47 vs 2 sectors
Broader product categories
28 vs 15 categories
Frequently Asked Questions
MARCO HOLDINGS has 6 government contracts valued at $4K, while XEROX has 1,683 contracts valued at $558.0B. By contract volume, XEROX leads. By total contract value, XEROX leads. Both vendors serve state and local government agencies across multiple states.
XEROX has 1,683 government contracts compared to MARCO HOLDINGS's 6. However, contract count alone doesn't tell the full story — contract values, agency diversity, and sector coverage all factor into evaluating a vendor's government market presence. Civic IQ provides detailed side-by-side analysis across all dimensions.
MARCO HOLDINGS serves 5 government agencies, while XEROX serves 533. XEROX has broader agency reach. Agency reach is a key indicator of a vendor's ability to navigate government procurement processes.
MARCO HOLDINGS operates in 5 states, while XEROX covers 50 states. XEROX has broader geographic coverage. Geographic footprint matters for agencies evaluating vendors with regional experience and for vendors assessing competitive landscapes in specific markets.
Between them, MARCO HOLDINGS and XEROX cover 6 government procurement sectors. They directly compete in Service. MARCO HOLDINGS's top sectors include Service, and PROFESSIONAL_SERVICES, while XEROX focuses on EQUIPMENT, TECHNOLOGY, and SUPPLIES.
See live SLED buying signals, source docs, decision-makers, contract context, and the next step into your CRM or pipeline.