Head-to-Head
Relative comparison across 6 key government procurement dimensions.
Detailed Stats
Raw metrics for each vendor across all tracked dimensions.
Advantages
Auto-generated comparison based on contract data.
Higher total contract value
$1.0B vs $57K
Active in 4 more states
37 vs 33
More diverse sector coverage
35 vs 26 sectors
235% more contracts
821 vs 245
115 more agencies served
247 vs 132
Broader product categories
29 vs 19 categories
Frequently Asked Questions
LYFT has 245 government contracts valued at $1.0B, while SAMS CLUB has 821 contracts valued at $57K. By contract volume, SAMS CLUB leads. By total contract value, LYFT leads. Both vendors serve state and local government agencies across multiple states.
SAMS CLUB has 821 government contracts compared to LYFT's 245. However, contract count alone doesn't tell the full story — contract values, agency diversity, and sector coverage all factor into evaluating a vendor's government market presence. Civic IQ provides detailed side-by-side analysis across all dimensions.
LYFT serves 132 government agencies, while SAMS CLUB serves 247. SAMS CLUB has broader agency reach. The two vendors share 8 agency clients in common, creating direct competitive overlap. Agency reach is a key indicator of a vendor's ability to navigate government procurement processes.
LYFT operates in 37 states, while SAMS CLUB covers 33 states. LYFT has broader geographic coverage. Geographic footprint matters for agencies evaluating vendors with regional experience and for vendors assessing competitive landscapes in specific markets.
Between them, LYFT and SAMS CLUB cover 10 government procurement sectors. LYFT's top sectors include TRANSPORTATION, Service, and Transportation, while SAMS CLUB focuses on SUPPLIES, Product, and FOOD_SERVICES.
Yes, LYFT and SAMS CLUB share 8 government agency clients, including Hitchcock-Tulare School District 56-6 (SD), Indianapolis Public Schools (IN), City of Robbinsdale (MN), Bedford Community School District (IA), and Thornton Fractional Twp HSD 215 (IL). Shared clients represent direct competitive overlap — tracking which agencies work with both vendors helps you understand switching patterns, contract renewal timing, and competitive displacement opportunities.
See live SLED buying signals, source docs, decision-makers, contract context, and the next step into your CRM or pipeline.