IRON MOUNTAIN vs IRON MOUNTAIN RECORDS MANAGEMENT — Government Contracts Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of government contract activity, agency reach, and market coverage.
Trusted by teams at
Head-to-Head
IRON MOUNTAIN vs IRON MOUNTAIN RECORDS MANAGEMENT
Relative comparison across 6 key government procurement dimensions.
Detailed Stats
Side-by-Side Numbers
Raw metrics for each vendor across all tracked dimensions.
Advantages
Where Each Vendor Leads
Auto-generated comparison based on contract data.
Why is IRON MOUNTAIN better?
1177% more contracts
613 vs 48
Higher total contract value
$643K vs $45K
192 more agencies served
206 vs 14
Active in 34 more states
40 vs 6
More diverse sector coverage
35 vs 5 sectors
Broader product categories
25 vs 11 categories
Frequently Asked Questions
IRON MOUNTAIN vs IRON MOUNTAIN RECORDS MANAGEMENT: Government Contracts Comparison
How does IRON MOUNTAIN compare to IRON MOUNTAIN RECORDS MANAGEMENT for government contracts?
IRON MOUNTAIN has 613 government contracts valued at $643K, while IRON MOUNTAIN RECORDS MANAGEMENT has 48 contracts valued at $45K. By contract volume, IRON MOUNTAIN leads. By total contract value, IRON MOUNTAIN leads. Both vendors serve state and local government agencies across multiple states.
Which has more government contracts, IRON MOUNTAIN or IRON MOUNTAIN RECORDS MANAGEMENT?
IRON MOUNTAIN has 613 government contracts compared to IRON MOUNTAIN RECORDS MANAGEMENT's 48. However, contract count alone doesn't tell the full story — contract values, agency diversity, and sector coverage all factor into evaluating a vendor's government market presence. Civic IQ provides detailed side-by-side analysis across all dimensions.
Does IRON MOUNTAIN or IRON MOUNTAIN RECORDS MANAGEMENT serve more government agencies?
IRON MOUNTAIN serves 206 government agencies, while IRON MOUNTAIN RECORDS MANAGEMENT serves 14. IRON MOUNTAIN has broader agency reach. The two vendors share 1 agency clients in common, creating direct competitive overlap. Agency reach is a key indicator of a vendor's ability to navigate government procurement processes.
In which states is IRON MOUNTAIN active vs IRON MOUNTAIN RECORDS MANAGEMENT?
IRON MOUNTAIN operates in 40 states, while IRON MOUNTAIN RECORDS MANAGEMENT covers 6 states. IRON MOUNTAIN has broader geographic coverage. Geographic footprint matters for agencies evaluating vendors with regional experience and for vendors assessing competitive landscapes in specific markets.
What sectors do IRON MOUNTAIN and IRON MOUNTAIN RECORDS MANAGEMENT compete in?
Between them, IRON MOUNTAIN and IRON MOUNTAIN RECORDS MANAGEMENT cover 5 government procurement sectors. They directly compete in PROFESSIONAL_SERVICES, MAINTENANCE, OTHER, Service, and SUPPLIES. IRON MOUNTAIN's top sectors include PROFESSIONAL_SERVICES, MAINTENANCE, and OTHER, while IRON MOUNTAIN RECORDS MANAGEMENT focuses on PROFESSIONAL_SERVICES, OTHER, and MAINTENANCE.
Do IRON MOUNTAIN and IRON MOUNTAIN RECORDS MANAGEMENT share any government agency clients?
Yes, IRON MOUNTAIN and IRON MOUNTAIN RECORDS MANAGEMENT share 1 government agency clients, including City of Longwood (FL). Shared clients represent direct competitive overlap — tracking which agencies work with both vendors helps you understand switching patterns, contract renewal timing, and competitive displacement opportunities.
Bring us your territory.
We'll show you what is forming.
See live SLED buying signals, source docs, decision-makers, contract context, and the next step into your CRM or pipeline.