Civic IQ

ICC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT vs ICC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS — Government Contracts Comparison

Side-by-side comparison of government contract activity, agency reach, and market coverage.

283 contracts combined102 agencies combined

Trusted by teams at

Motive logo
Veritone logo
HomeWAV logo
Ideal Impact logo
Sports Facilities logo
Productive Parks logo
Acuantia logo
Route Reports logo
Comcate logo
Motive logo
Veritone logo
HomeWAV logo
Ideal Impact logo
Sports Facilities logo
Productive Parks logo
Acuantia logo
Route Reports logo
Comcate logo

Head-to-Head

ICC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT vs ICC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS

Relative comparison across 6 key government procurement dimensions.

42
Points
98
Points

Detailed Stats

Side-by-Side Numbers

Raw metrics for each vendor across all tracked dimensions.

Metric
ICC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
ICC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS
Total Contracts
15
268
Total Contract Value
$185K
$5696020242026101.0B
Agencies Served
10
92
States Active
5
18
Sectors Covered
9
48
Product Categories
14
10

Advantages

Where Each Vendor Leads

Auto-generated comparison based on contract data.

Why is ICC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT better?

Broader product categories

14 vs 10 categories

Why is ICC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS better?

1687% more contracts

268 vs 15

Higher total contract value

$5696020242026101.0B vs $185K

82 more agencies served

92 vs 10

Active in 13 more states

18 vs 5

More diverse sector coverage

48 vs 9 sectors

Frequently Asked Questions

ICC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT vs ICC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS: Government Contracts Comparison

How does ICC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT compare to ICC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS for government contracts?

ICC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT has 15 government contracts valued at $185K, while ICC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS has 268 contracts valued at $5696020242026101.0B. By contract volume, ICC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS leads. By total contract value, ICC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS leads. Both vendors serve state and local government agencies across multiple states.

Which has more government contracts, ICC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT or ICC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS?

ICC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS has 268 government contracts compared to ICC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT's 15. However, contract count alone doesn't tell the full story — contract values, agency diversity, and sector coverage all factor into evaluating a vendor's government market presence. Civic IQ provides detailed side-by-side analysis across all dimensions.

Does ICC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT or ICC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS serve more government agencies?

ICC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT serves 10 government agencies, while ICC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS serves 92. ICC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS has broader agency reach. The two vendors share 2 agency clients in common, creating direct competitive overlap. Agency reach is a key indicator of a vendor's ability to navigate government procurement processes.

In which states is ICC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT active vs ICC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS?

ICC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT operates in 5 states, while ICC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS covers 18 states. ICC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS has broader geographic coverage. Geographic footprint matters for agencies evaluating vendors with regional experience and for vendors assessing competitive landscapes in specific markets.

What sectors do ICC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT and ICC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS compete in?

Between them, ICC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT and ICC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS cover 7 government procurement sectors. They directly compete in TECHNOLOGY, Service, and Software. ICC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT's top sectors include TECHNOLOGY, Service, and Software, while ICC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS focuses on TECHNOLOGY, Software, and Service.

Do ICC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT and ICC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS share any government agency clients?

Yes, ICC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT and ICC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS share 2 government agency clients, including Town of Ossining (NY), and Town of Saratoga (NE). Shared clients represent direct competitive overlap — tracking which agencies work with both vendors helps you understand switching patterns, contract renewal timing, and competitive displacement opportunities.

Bring us your territory.
We'll show you what is forming.

See live SLED buying signals, source docs, decision-makers, contract context, and the next step into your CRM or pipeline.

Try Civic IQ for free