ERATE CONSULTING vs SHI — Government Contracts Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of government contract activity, agency reach, and market coverage.
Trusted by teams at
Head-to-Head
ERATE CONSULTING vs SHI
Relative comparison across 6 key government procurement dimensions.
Detailed Stats
Side-by-Side Numbers
Raw metrics for each vendor across all tracked dimensions.
Advantages
Where Each Vendor Leads
Auto-generated comparison based on contract data.
Why is SHI better?
1294% more contracts
1,715 vs 123
Higher total contract value
$18600.0B vs $108.0M
517 more agencies served
567 vs 50
Active in 38 more states
49 vs 11
More diverse sector coverage
58 vs 23 sectors
Broader product categories
26 vs 8 categories
Frequently Asked Questions
ERATE CONSULTING vs SHI: Government Contracts Comparison
How does ERATE CONSULTING compare to SHI for government contracts?
ERATE CONSULTING has 123 government contracts valued at $108.0M, while SHI has 1,715 contracts valued at $18600.0B. By contract volume, SHI leads. By total contract value, SHI leads. Both vendors serve state and local government agencies across multiple states.
Which has more government contracts, ERATE CONSULTING or SHI?
SHI has 1,715 government contracts compared to ERATE CONSULTING's 123. However, contract count alone doesn't tell the full story — contract values, agency diversity, and sector coverage all factor into evaluating a vendor's government market presence. Civic IQ provides detailed side-by-side analysis across all dimensions.
Does ERATE CONSULTING or SHI serve more government agencies?
ERATE CONSULTING serves 50 government agencies, while SHI serves 567. SHI has broader agency reach. The two vendors share 6 agency clients in common, creating direct competitive overlap. Agency reach is a key indicator of a vendor's ability to navigate government procurement processes.
In which states is ERATE CONSULTING active vs SHI?
ERATE CONSULTING operates in 11 states, while SHI covers 49 states. SHI has broader geographic coverage. Geographic footprint matters for agencies evaluating vendors with regional experience and for vendors assessing competitive landscapes in specific markets.
What sectors do ERATE CONSULTING and SHI compete in?
Between them, ERATE CONSULTING and SHI cover 10 government procurement sectors. ERATE CONSULTING's top sectors include Consulting, Service, and CONSULTING, while SHI focuses on TECHNOLOGY, EQUIPMENT, and LICENSE.
Do ERATE CONSULTING and SHI share any government agency clients?
Yes, ERATE CONSULTING and SHI share 6 government agency clients, including Randolph Township School District (NJ), Walton County School District (FL), Sayreville School District (NJ), Point Pleasant Borough School District (NJ), and Cedar Grove Township School District (NJ). Shared clients represent direct competitive overlap — tracking which agencies work with both vendors helps you understand switching patterns, contract renewal timing, and competitive displacement opportunities.
Bring us your territory.
We'll show you what is forming.
See live SLED buying signals, source docs, decision-makers, contract context, and the next step into your CRM or pipeline.