Side-by-side comparison of government contract activity, agency reach, and market coverage.
Trusted by teams at
Head-to-Head
Relative comparison across 6 key government procurement dimensions.
Detailed Stats
Raw metrics for each vendor across all tracked dimensions.
Advantages
Auto-generated comparison based on contract data.
Higher total contract value
$2.4M vs $711K
539% more contracts
780 vs 122
123 more agencies served
174 vs 51
Active in 5 more states
21 vs 16
More diverse sector coverage
57 vs 37 sectors
Broader product categories
20 vs 5 categories
Frequently Asked Questions
COX COMMUNICATION has 122 government contracts valued at $2.4M, while COX COMMUNICATIONS has 780 contracts valued at $711K. By contract volume, COX COMMUNICATIONS leads. By total contract value, COX COMMUNICATION leads. Both vendors serve state and local government agencies across multiple states.
COX COMMUNICATIONS has 780 government contracts compared to COX COMMUNICATION's 122. However, contract count alone doesn't tell the full story — contract values, agency diversity, and sector coverage all factor into evaluating a vendor's government market presence. Civic IQ provides detailed side-by-side analysis across all dimensions.
COX COMMUNICATION serves 51 government agencies, while COX COMMUNICATIONS serves 174. COX COMMUNICATIONS has broader agency reach. The two vendors share 10 agency clients in common, creating direct competitive overlap. Agency reach is a key indicator of a vendor's ability to navigate government procurement processes.
COX COMMUNICATION operates in 16 states, while COX COMMUNICATIONS covers 21 states. COX COMMUNICATIONS has broader geographic coverage. Geographic footprint matters for agencies evaluating vendors with regional experience and for vendors assessing competitive landscapes in specific markets.
Between them, COX COMMUNICATION and COX COMMUNICATIONS cover 7 government procurement sectors. They directly compete in UTILITIES, Service, and TECHNOLOGY. COX COMMUNICATION's top sectors include UTILITIES, Service, and TECHNOLOGY, while COX COMMUNICATIONS focuses on UTILITIES, TECHNOLOGY, and Service.
Yes, COX COMMUNICATION and COX COMMUNICATIONS share 10 government agency clients, including City of Litchfield Park (AZ), Okaloosa County School District (FL), City of Andover (KS), Millard Public Schools (NE), and Manhattan-Ogden Unified School District 383 (KS). Shared clients represent direct competitive overlap — tracking which agencies work with both vendors helps you understand switching patterns, contract renewal timing, and competitive displacement opportunities.
See live SLED buying signals, source docs, decision-makers, contract context, and the next step into your CRM or pipeline.