Side-by-side comparison of government contract activity, agency reach, and market coverage.
Trusted by teams at
Head-to-Head
Relative comparison across 6 key government procurement dimensions.
Detailed Stats
Raw metrics for each vendor across all tracked dimensions.
Advantages
Auto-generated comparison based on contract data.
49% more contracts
254 vs 170
92 more agencies served
159 vs 67
Active in 25 more states
41 vs 16
Higher total contract value
$53000404640487504.0B vs $220K
More diverse sector coverage
23 vs 19 sectors
Broader product categories
8 vs 7 categories
Frequently Asked Questions
CLEVER has 254 government contracts valued at $220K, while ECRA GROUP has 170 contracts valued at $53000404640487504.0B. By contract volume, CLEVER leads. By total contract value, ECRA GROUP leads. Both vendors serve state and local government agencies across multiple states.
CLEVER has 254 government contracts compared to ECRA GROUP's 170. However, contract count alone doesn't tell the full story — contract values, agency diversity, and sector coverage all factor into evaluating a vendor's government market presence. Civic IQ provides detailed side-by-side analysis across all dimensions.
CLEVER serves 159 government agencies, while ECRA GROUP serves 67. CLEVER has broader agency reach. The two vendors share 3 agency clients in common, creating direct competitive overlap. Agency reach is a key indicator of a vendor's ability to navigate government procurement processes.
CLEVER operates in 41 states, while ECRA GROUP covers 16 states. CLEVER has broader geographic coverage. Geographic footprint matters for agencies evaluating vendors with regional experience and for vendors assessing competitive landscapes in specific markets.
Between them, CLEVER and ECRA GROUP cover 9 government procurement sectors. They directly compete in Service. CLEVER's top sectors include TECHNOLOGY, Service, and License, while ECRA GROUP focuses on Service, PROFESSIONAL_SERVICES, and Consulting.
Yes, CLEVER and ECRA GROUP share 3 government agency clients, including Lake Bluff ESD 65 (IL), School Administrative District 65 (ME), and Ridgeland SD 122 (IL). Shared clients represent direct competitive overlap — tracking which agencies work with both vendors helps you understand switching patterns, contract renewal timing, and competitive displacement opportunities.
See live SLED buying signals, source docs, decision-makers, contract context, and the next step into your CRM or pipeline.