Civic IQ

CHANGE HEALTHCARE vs MEDICAL BILLING TECHNOLOGIES — Government Contracts Comparison

Side-by-side comparison of government contract activity, agency reach, and market coverage.

276 contracts combined106 agencies combined

Trusted by teams at

Motive logo
Veritone logo
HomeWAV logo
Ideal Impact logo
Sports Facilities logo
Productive Parks logo
Acuantia logo
Route Reports logo
Comcate logo
Motive logo
Veritone logo
HomeWAV logo
Ideal Impact logo
Sports Facilities logo
Productive Parks logo
Acuantia logo
Route Reports logo
Comcate logo

Head-to-Head

CHANGE HEALTHCARE vs MEDICAL BILLING TECHNOLOGIES

Relative comparison across 6 key government procurement dimensions.

91
Points
88
Points

Detailed Stats

Side-by-Side Numbers

Raw metrics for each vendor across all tracked dimensions.

Metric
CHANGE HEALTHCARE
MEDICAL BILLING TECHNOLOGIES
Total Contracts
119
157
Total Contract Value
$5.3M
$8.7M
Agencies Served
52
54
States Active
21
6
Sectors Covered
22
34
Product Categories
11
6

Advantages

Where Each Vendor Leads

Auto-generated comparison based on contract data.

Why is CHANGE HEALTHCARE better?

Active in 15 more states

21 vs 6

Broader product categories

11 vs 6 categories

Why is MEDICAL BILLING TECHNOLOGIES better?

32% more contracts

157 vs 119

Higher total contract value

$8.7M vs $5.3M

2 more agencies served

54 vs 52

More diverse sector coverage

34 vs 22 sectors

Frequently Asked Questions

CHANGE HEALTHCARE vs MEDICAL BILLING TECHNOLOGIES: Government Contracts Comparison

How does CHANGE HEALTHCARE compare to MEDICAL BILLING TECHNOLOGIES for government contracts?

CHANGE HEALTHCARE has 119 government contracts valued at $5.3M, while MEDICAL BILLING TECHNOLOGIES has 157 contracts valued at $8.7M. By contract volume, MEDICAL BILLING TECHNOLOGIES leads. By total contract value, MEDICAL BILLING TECHNOLOGIES leads. Both vendors serve state and local government agencies across multiple states.

Which has more government contracts, CHANGE HEALTHCARE or MEDICAL BILLING TECHNOLOGIES?

MEDICAL BILLING TECHNOLOGIES has 157 government contracts compared to CHANGE HEALTHCARE's 119. However, contract count alone doesn't tell the full story — contract values, agency diversity, and sector coverage all factor into evaluating a vendor's government market presence. Civic IQ provides detailed side-by-side analysis across all dimensions.

Does CHANGE HEALTHCARE or MEDICAL BILLING TECHNOLOGIES serve more government agencies?

CHANGE HEALTHCARE serves 52 government agencies, while MEDICAL BILLING TECHNOLOGIES serves 54. MEDICAL BILLING TECHNOLOGIES has broader agency reach. Agency reach is a key indicator of a vendor's ability to navigate government procurement processes.

In which states is CHANGE HEALTHCARE active vs MEDICAL BILLING TECHNOLOGIES?

CHANGE HEALTHCARE operates in 21 states, while MEDICAL BILLING TECHNOLOGIES covers 6 states. CHANGE HEALTHCARE has broader geographic coverage. Geographic footprint matters for agencies evaluating vendors with regional experience and for vendors assessing competitive landscapes in specific markets.

What sectors do CHANGE HEALTHCARE and MEDICAL BILLING TECHNOLOGIES compete in?

Between them, CHANGE HEALTHCARE and MEDICAL BILLING TECHNOLOGIES cover 8 government procurement sectors. They directly compete in PROFESSIONAL_SERVICES, and Service. CHANGE HEALTHCARE's top sectors include TECHNOLOGY, PROFESSIONAL_SERVICES, and Service, while MEDICAL BILLING TECHNOLOGIES focuses on Service, PROFESSIONAL_SERVICES, and Medical Billing.

Bring us your territory.
We'll show you what is forming.

See live SLED buying signals, source docs, decision-makers, contract context, and the next step into your CRM or pipeline.

Try Civic IQ for free