Head-to-Head
Relative comparison across 6 key government procurement dimensions.
Detailed Stats
Raw metrics for each vendor across all tracked dimensions.
Advantages
Auto-generated comparison based on contract data.
7471% more contracts
4,240 vs 56
1,147 more agencies served
1,182 vs 35
Active in 32 more states
48 vs 16
More diverse sector coverage
512 vs 22 sectors
Broader product categories
30 vs 11 categories
Higher total contract value
$703.8M vs $15.6M
Frequently Asked Questions
CDW has 4,240 government contracts valued at $15.6M, while INTEL has 56 contracts valued at $703.8M. By contract volume, CDW leads. By total contract value, INTEL leads. Both vendors serve state and local government agencies across multiple states.
CDW has 4,240 government contracts compared to INTEL's 56. However, contract count alone doesn't tell the full story — contract values, agency diversity, and sector coverage all factor into evaluating a vendor's government market presence. Civic IQ provides detailed side-by-side analysis across all dimensions.
CDW serves 1,182 government agencies, while INTEL serves 35. CDW has broader agency reach. Agency reach is a key indicator of a vendor's ability to navigate government procurement processes.
CDW operates in 48 states, while INTEL covers 16 states. CDW has broader geographic coverage. Geographic footprint matters for agencies evaluating vendors with regional experience and for vendors assessing competitive landscapes in specific markets.
Between them, CDW and INTEL cover 9 government procurement sectors. They directly compete in TECHNOLOGY. CDW's top sectors include TECHNOLOGY, Purchase, and Product, while INTEL focuses on Donation, Grant, and Sponsorship.
See live SLED buying signals, source docs, decision-makers, contract context, and the next step into your CRM or pipeline.