Side-by-side comparison of government contract activity, agency reach, and market coverage.
Trusted by teams at
Head-to-Head
Relative comparison across 6 key government procurement dimensions.
Detailed Stats
Raw metrics for each vendor across all tracked dimensions.
Advantages
Auto-generated comparison based on contract data.
2695% more contracts
4,192 vs 150
1,129 more agencies served
1,177 vs 48
Active in 34 more states
48 vs 14
More diverse sector coverage
512 vs 24 sectors
Broader product categories
30 vs 14 categories
Higher total contract value
$70.3M vs $15.8M
Frequently Asked Questions
CDW has 4,192 government contracts valued at $15.8M, while CONSOR NORTH AMERICA has 150 contracts valued at $70.3M. By contract volume, CDW leads. By total contract value, CONSOR NORTH AMERICA leads. Both vendors serve state and local government agencies across multiple states.
CDW has 4,192 government contracts compared to CONSOR NORTH AMERICA's 150. However, contract count alone doesn't tell the full story — contract values, agency diversity, and sector coverage all factor into evaluating a vendor's government market presence. Civic IQ provides detailed side-by-side analysis across all dimensions.
CDW serves 1,177 government agencies, while CONSOR NORTH AMERICA serves 48. CDW has broader agency reach. The two vendors share 2 agency clients in common, creating direct competitive overlap. Agency reach is a key indicator of a vendor's ability to navigate government procurement processes.
CDW operates in 48 states, while CONSOR NORTH AMERICA covers 14 states. CDW has broader geographic coverage. Geographic footprint matters for agencies evaluating vendors with regional experience and for vendors assessing competitive landscapes in specific markets.
Between them, CDW and CONSOR NORTH AMERICA cover 10 government procurement sectors. CDW's top sectors include TECHNOLOGY, Purchase, and Product, while CONSOR NORTH AMERICA focuses on PROFESSIONAL_SERVICES, Service, and Consulting.
Yes, CDW and CONSOR NORTH AMERICA share 2 government agency clients, including City of Ridgefield (WA), and Tehama County (CA). Shared clients represent direct competitive overlap — tracking which agencies work with both vendors helps you understand switching patterns, contract renewal timing, and competitive displacement opportunities.
See live SLED buying signals, source docs, decision-makers, contract context, and the next step into your CRM or pipeline.