Side-by-side comparison of government contract activity, agency reach, and market coverage.
Trusted by teams at
Head-to-Head
Relative comparison across 6 key government procurement dimensions.
Detailed Stats
Raw metrics for each vendor across all tracked dimensions.
Advantages
Auto-generated comparison based on contract data.
858% more contracts
115 vs 12
Higher total contract value
$12.5M vs $35K
66 more agencies served
73 vs 7
Active in 21 more states
26 vs 5
More diverse sector coverage
22 vs 2 sectors
Broader product categories
18 vs 7 categories
Frequently Asked Questions
BLUEBEAM has 115 government contracts valued at $12.5M, while BLUEBEAM SOFTWARE has 12 contracts valued at $35K. By contract volume, BLUEBEAM leads. By total contract value, BLUEBEAM leads. Both vendors serve state and local government agencies across multiple states.
BLUEBEAM has 115 government contracts compared to BLUEBEAM SOFTWARE's 12. However, contract count alone doesn't tell the full story — contract values, agency diversity, and sector coverage all factor into evaluating a vendor's government market presence. Civic IQ provides detailed side-by-side analysis across all dimensions.
BLUEBEAM serves 73 government agencies, while BLUEBEAM SOFTWARE serves 7. BLUEBEAM has broader agency reach. The two vendors share 1 agency clients in common, creating direct competitive overlap. Agency reach is a key indicator of a vendor's ability to navigate government procurement processes.
BLUEBEAM operates in 26 states, while BLUEBEAM SOFTWARE covers 5 states. BLUEBEAM has broader geographic coverage. Geographic footprint matters for agencies evaluating vendors with regional experience and for vendors assessing competitive landscapes in specific markets.
Between them, BLUEBEAM and BLUEBEAM SOFTWARE cover 5 government procurement sectors. They directly compete in TECHNOLOGY, and License. BLUEBEAM's top sectors include TECHNOLOGY, Software, and License, while BLUEBEAM SOFTWARE focuses on TECHNOLOGY, and License.
Yes, BLUEBEAM and BLUEBEAM SOFTWARE share 1 government agency clients, including Jefferson County (CO). Shared clients represent direct competitive overlap — tracking which agencies work with both vendors helps you understand switching patterns, contract renewal timing, and competitive displacement opportunities.
See live SLED buying signals, source docs, decision-makers, contract context, and the next step into your CRM or pipeline.