Side-by-side comparison of government contract activity, agency reach, and market coverage.
Trusted by teams at
Head-to-Head
Relative comparison across 6 key government procurement dimensions.
Detailed Stats
Raw metrics for each vendor across all tracked dimensions.
Advantages
Auto-generated comparison based on contract data.
Broader product categories
30 vs 23 categories
1110% more contracts
714 vs 59
Higher total contract value
$146.4B vs $560K
305 more agencies served
339 vs 34
Active in 25 more states
41 vs 16
More diverse sector coverage
59 vs 10 sectors
Frequently Asked Questions
ATT has 59 government contracts valued at $560K, while CROWN CASTLE has 714 contracts valued at $146.4B. By contract volume, CROWN CASTLE leads. By total contract value, CROWN CASTLE leads. Both vendors serve state and local government agencies across multiple states.
CROWN CASTLE has 714 government contracts compared to ATT's 59. However, contract count alone doesn't tell the full story — contract values, agency diversity, and sector coverage all factor into evaluating a vendor's government market presence. Civic IQ provides detailed side-by-side analysis across all dimensions.
ATT serves 34 government agencies, while CROWN CASTLE serves 339. CROWN CASTLE has broader agency reach. The two vendors share 1 agency clients in common, creating direct competitive overlap. Agency reach is a key indicator of a vendor's ability to navigate government procurement processes.
ATT operates in 16 states, while CROWN CASTLE covers 41 states. CROWN CASTLE has broader geographic coverage. Geographic footprint matters for agencies evaluating vendors with regional experience and for vendors assessing competitive landscapes in specific markets.
Between them, ATT and CROWN CASTLE cover 8 government procurement sectors. They directly compete in Service, and OTHER. ATT's top sectors include UTILITIES, Permit Extension, and Service, while CROWN CASTLE focuses on TECHNOLOGY, OTHER, and FACILITIES.
Yes, ATT and CROWN CASTLE share 1 government agency clients, including Denton County (TX). Shared clients represent direct competitive overlap — tracking which agencies work with both vendors helps you understand switching patterns, contract renewal timing, and competitive displacement opportunities.
Right now, in a conference room somewhere, an agency is naming the vendor for your next contract. Be the one they name.