ATHLETIC FIELDS OF AMERICA vs FIELDTURF USA — Government Contracts Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of government contract activity, agency reach, and market coverage.
Trusted by teams at
Head-to-Head
ATHLETIC FIELDS OF AMERICA vs FIELDTURF USA
Relative comparison across 6 key government procurement dimensions.
Detailed Stats
Side-by-Side Numbers
Raw metrics for each vendor across all tracked dimensions.
Advantages
Where Each Vendor Leads
Auto-generated comparison based on contract data.
Why is FIELDTURF USA better?
238% more contracts
351 vs 104
Higher total contract value
$27855.1B vs $553.6B
149 more agencies served
172 vs 23
Active in 28 more states
34 vs 6
More diverse sector coverage
65 vs 14 sectors
Broader product categories
15 vs 4 categories
Frequently Asked Questions
ATHLETIC FIELDS OF AMERICA vs FIELDTURF USA: Government Contracts Comparison
How does ATHLETIC FIELDS OF AMERICA compare to FIELDTURF USA for government contracts?
ATHLETIC FIELDS OF AMERICA has 104 government contracts valued at $553.6B, while FIELDTURF USA has 351 contracts valued at $27855.1B. By contract volume, FIELDTURF USA leads. By total contract value, FIELDTURF USA leads. Both vendors serve state and local government agencies across multiple states.
Which has more government contracts, ATHLETIC FIELDS OF AMERICA or FIELDTURF USA?
FIELDTURF USA has 351 government contracts compared to ATHLETIC FIELDS OF AMERICA's 104. However, contract count alone doesn't tell the full story — contract values, agency diversity, and sector coverage all factor into evaluating a vendor's government market presence. Civic IQ provides detailed side-by-side analysis across all dimensions.
Does ATHLETIC FIELDS OF AMERICA or FIELDTURF USA serve more government agencies?
ATHLETIC FIELDS OF AMERICA serves 23 government agencies, while FIELDTURF USA serves 172. FIELDTURF USA has broader agency reach. Agency reach is a key indicator of a vendor's ability to navigate government procurement processes.
In which states is ATHLETIC FIELDS OF AMERICA active vs FIELDTURF USA?
ATHLETIC FIELDS OF AMERICA operates in 6 states, while FIELDTURF USA covers 34 states. FIELDTURF USA has broader geographic coverage. Geographic footprint matters for agencies evaluating vendors with regional experience and for vendors assessing competitive landscapes in specific markets.
What sectors do ATHLETIC FIELDS OF AMERICA and FIELDTURF USA compete in?
Between them, ATHLETIC FIELDS OF AMERICA and FIELDTURF USA cover 7 government procurement sectors. They directly compete in CONSTRUCTION, Construction, and Service. ATHLETIC FIELDS OF AMERICA's top sectors include CONSTRUCTION, Construction, and Service, while FIELDTURF USA focuses on Construction, CONSTRUCTION, and Service.
Bring us your territory.
We'll show you what is forming.
See live SLED buying signals, source docs, decision-makers, contract context, and the next step into your CRM or pipeline.