Civic IQ

ARTHUR J GALLAGHER RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES vs MUNICIPAL POOLING AUTHORITY — Government Contracts Comparison

Side-by-side comparison of government contract activity, agency reach, and market coverage.

231 contracts combined123 agencies combined

Trusted by teams at

Motive logo
Veritone logo
HomeWAV logo
Ideal Impact logo
Sports Facilities logo
Productive Parks logo
Acuantia logo
Route Reports logo
Comcate logo
Motive logo
Veritone logo
HomeWAV logo
Ideal Impact logo
Sports Facilities logo
Productive Parks logo
Acuantia logo
Route Reports logo
Comcate logo

Head-to-Head

ARTHUR J GALLAGHER RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES vs MUNICIPAL POOLING AUTHORITY

Relative comparison across 6 key government procurement dimensions.

83
Points
50
Points

Detailed Stats

Side-by-Side Numbers

Raw metrics for each vendor across all tracked dimensions.

Metric
ARTHUR J GALLAGHER RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES
MUNICIPAL POOLING AUTHORITY
Total Contracts
188
43
Total Contract Value
$33.6M
$2.599001680035e+27B
Agencies Served
109
14
States Active
23
4
Sectors Covered
26
2
Product Categories
14
3

Advantages

Where Each Vendor Leads

Auto-generated comparison based on contract data.

Why is ARTHUR J GALLAGHER RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES better?

337% more contracts

188 vs 43

95 more agencies served

109 vs 14

Active in 19 more states

23 vs 4

More diverse sector coverage

26 vs 2 sectors

Broader product categories

14 vs 3 categories

Why is MUNICIPAL POOLING AUTHORITY better?

Higher total contract value

$2.599001680035e+27B vs $33.6M

Frequently Asked Questions

ARTHUR J GALLAGHER RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES vs MUNICIPAL POOLING AUTHORITY: Government Contracts Comparison

How does ARTHUR J GALLAGHER RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES compare to MUNICIPAL POOLING AUTHORITY for government contracts?

ARTHUR J GALLAGHER RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES has 188 government contracts valued at $33.6M, while MUNICIPAL POOLING AUTHORITY has 43 contracts valued at $2.599001680035e+27B. By contract volume, ARTHUR J GALLAGHER RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES leads. By total contract value, MUNICIPAL POOLING AUTHORITY leads. Both vendors serve state and local government agencies across multiple states.

Which has more government contracts, ARTHUR J GALLAGHER RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES or MUNICIPAL POOLING AUTHORITY?

ARTHUR J GALLAGHER RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES has 188 government contracts compared to MUNICIPAL POOLING AUTHORITY's 43. However, contract count alone doesn't tell the full story — contract values, agency diversity, and sector coverage all factor into evaluating a vendor's government market presence. Civic IQ provides detailed side-by-side analysis across all dimensions.

Does ARTHUR J GALLAGHER RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES or MUNICIPAL POOLING AUTHORITY serve more government agencies?

ARTHUR J GALLAGHER RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES serves 109 government agencies, while MUNICIPAL POOLING AUTHORITY serves 14. ARTHUR J GALLAGHER RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES has broader agency reach. Agency reach is a key indicator of a vendor's ability to navigate government procurement processes.

In which states is ARTHUR J GALLAGHER RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES active vs MUNICIPAL POOLING AUTHORITY?

ARTHUR J GALLAGHER RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES operates in 23 states, while MUNICIPAL POOLING AUTHORITY covers 4 states. ARTHUR J GALLAGHER RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES has broader geographic coverage. Geographic footprint matters for agencies evaluating vendors with regional experience and for vendors assessing competitive landscapes in specific markets.

What sectors do ARTHUR J GALLAGHER RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES and MUNICIPAL POOLING AUTHORITY compete in?

Between them, ARTHUR J GALLAGHER RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES and MUNICIPAL POOLING AUTHORITY cover 6 government procurement sectors. They directly compete in INSURANCE. ARTHUR J GALLAGHER RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES's top sectors include INSURANCE, Insurance, and Service, while MUNICIPAL POOLING AUTHORITY focuses on INSURANCE, and JUL-SEPT EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM PREMIUM.

Bring us your territory.
We'll show you what is forming.

See live SLED buying signals, source docs, decision-makers, contract context, and the next step into your CRM or pipeline.