Civic IQ

AQUATIC TECHNOLOGIES vs LAKE MANAGEMENT SCIENCES — Government Contracts Comparison

Side-by-side comparison of government contract activity, agency reach, and market coverage.

32 contracts combined13 agencies combined

Trusted by teams at

Motive logo
Veritone logo
TerraCycle logo
Cyvl logo
WithersRavenel logo
Derivita logo
Comcate logo
SafeTouch logo
IANS Research logo
Motive logo
Veritone logo
TerraCycle logo
Cyvl logo
WithersRavenel logo
Derivita logo
Comcate logo
SafeTouch logo
IANS Research logo
Motive logo
Veritone logo
TerraCycle logo
Cyvl logo
WithersRavenel logo
Derivita logo
Comcate logo
SafeTouch logo
IANS Research logo
Motive logo
Veritone logo
TerraCycle logo
Cyvl logo
WithersRavenel logo
Derivita logo
Comcate logo
SafeTouch logo
IANS Research logo

Head-to-Head

AQUATIC TECHNOLOGIES vs LAKE MANAGEMENT SCIENCES

Relative comparison across 6 key government procurement dimensions.

44
Points
99
Points

Detailed Stats

Side-by-Side Numbers

Raw metrics for each vendor across all tracked dimensions.

Metric
AQUATIC TECHNOLOGIES
LAKE MANAGEMENT SCIENCES
Total Contracts
2
30
Total Contract Value
$0
$2.1M
Agencies Served
1
12
States Active
1
2
Sectors Covered
1
8
Product Categories
12
10

Advantages

Where Each Vendor Leads

Auto-generated comparison based on contract data.

Why is AQUATIC TECHNOLOGIES better?

Broader product categories

12 vs 10 categories

Why is LAKE MANAGEMENT SCIENCES better?

1400% more contracts

30 vs 2

Higher total contract value

$2.1M vs $0

11 more agencies served

12 vs 1

Active in 1 more state

2 vs 1

More diverse sector coverage

8 vs 1 sectors

Frequently Asked Questions

AQUATIC TECHNOLOGIES vs LAKE MANAGEMENT SCIENCES: Government Contracts Comparison

How does AQUATIC TECHNOLOGIES compare to LAKE MANAGEMENT SCIENCES for government contracts?

AQUATIC TECHNOLOGIES has 2 government contracts valued at $0, while LAKE MANAGEMENT SCIENCES has 30 contracts valued at $2.1M. By contract volume, LAKE MANAGEMENT SCIENCES leads. By total contract value, LAKE MANAGEMENT SCIENCES leads. Both vendors serve state and local government agencies across multiple states.

Which has more government contracts, AQUATIC TECHNOLOGIES or LAKE MANAGEMENT SCIENCES?

LAKE MANAGEMENT SCIENCES has 30 government contracts compared to AQUATIC TECHNOLOGIES's 2. However, contract count alone doesn't tell the full story — contract values, agency diversity, and sector coverage all factor into evaluating a vendor's government market presence. Civic IQ provides detailed side-by-side analysis across all dimensions.

Does AQUATIC TECHNOLOGIES or LAKE MANAGEMENT SCIENCES serve more government agencies?

AQUATIC TECHNOLOGIES serves 1 government agencies, while LAKE MANAGEMENT SCIENCES serves 12. LAKE MANAGEMENT SCIENCES has broader agency reach. Agency reach is a key indicator of a vendor's ability to navigate government procurement processes.

In which states is AQUATIC TECHNOLOGIES active vs LAKE MANAGEMENT SCIENCES?

AQUATIC TECHNOLOGIES operates in 1 states, while LAKE MANAGEMENT SCIENCES covers 2 states. LAKE MANAGEMENT SCIENCES has broader geographic coverage. Geographic footprint matters for agencies evaluating vendors with regional experience and for vendors assessing competitive landscapes in specific markets.

What sectors do AQUATIC TECHNOLOGIES and LAKE MANAGEMENT SCIENCES compete in?

Between them, AQUATIC TECHNOLOGIES and LAKE MANAGEMENT SCIENCES cover 6 government procurement sectors. AQUATIC TECHNOLOGIES's top sectors include Construction, while LAKE MANAGEMENT SCIENCES focuses on MAINTENANCE, Service, and Aquatic Management Program.

Bring us your territory.
We'll show you what is forming.

See live SLED buying signals, source docs, decision-makers, contract context, and the next step into your CRM or pipeline.

Try Civic IQ for free