Side-by-side comparison of government contract activity, agency reach, and market coverage.
Trusted by teams at
Head-to-Head
Relative comparison across 6 key government procurement dimensions.
Detailed Stats
Raw metrics for each vendor across all tracked dimensions.
Advantages
Auto-generated comparison based on contract data.
2180% more contracts
2,554 vs 112
Higher total contract value
$80.4B vs $23.5M
1,045 more agencies served
1,092 vs 47
Active in 29 more states
49 vs 20
More diverse sector coverage
84 vs 29 sectors
Broader product categories
30 vs 19 categories
Frequently Asked Questions
APPLE has 2,554 government contracts valued at $80.4B, while DAVENPORT GROUP has 112 contracts valued at $23.5M. By contract volume, APPLE leads. By total contract value, APPLE leads. Both vendors serve state and local government agencies across multiple states.
APPLE has 2,554 government contracts compared to DAVENPORT GROUP's 112. However, contract count alone doesn't tell the full story — contract values, agency diversity, and sector coverage all factor into evaluating a vendor's government market presence. Civic IQ provides detailed side-by-side analysis across all dimensions.
APPLE serves 1,092 government agencies, while DAVENPORT GROUP serves 47. APPLE has broader agency reach. The two vendors share 2 agency clients in common, creating direct competitive overlap. Agency reach is a key indicator of a vendor's ability to navigate government procurement processes.
APPLE operates in 49 states, while DAVENPORT GROUP covers 20 states. APPLE has broader geographic coverage. Geographic footprint matters for agencies evaluating vendors with regional experience and for vendors assessing competitive landscapes in specific markets.
Between them, APPLE and DAVENPORT GROUP cover 8 government procurement sectors. They directly compete in TECHNOLOGY, and Product. APPLE's top sectors include TECHNOLOGY, EQUIPMENT, and Product, while DAVENPORT GROUP focuses on TECHNOLOGY, Service, and Firmware Update.
Yes, APPLE and DAVENPORT GROUP share 2 government agency clients, including Noble Public Schools (OK), and City of Kissimmee (FL). Shared clients represent direct competitive overlap — tracking which agencies work with both vendors helps you understand switching patterns, contract renewal timing, and competitive displacement opportunities.
See live SLED buying signals, source docs, decision-makers, contract context, and the next step into your CRM or pipeline.