Side-by-side comparison of government contract activity, agency reach, and market coverage.
Trusted by teams at
Head-to-Head
Relative comparison across 6 key government procurement dimensions.
Detailed Stats
Raw metrics for each vendor across all tracked dimensions.
Advantages
Auto-generated comparison based on contract data.
Higher total contract value
$7.2M vs $2.2M
58% more contracts
30 vs 19
10 more agencies served
16 vs 6
Broader product categories
17 vs 9 categories
Frequently Asked Questions
ALLIED CONTROLS has 19 government contracts valued at $7.2M, while JOHNSON SUPPLY has 30 contracts valued at $2.2M. By contract volume, JOHNSON SUPPLY leads. By total contract value, ALLIED CONTROLS leads. Both vendors serve state and local government agencies across multiple states.
JOHNSON SUPPLY has 30 government contracts compared to ALLIED CONTROLS's 19. However, contract count alone doesn't tell the full story — contract values, agency diversity, and sector coverage all factor into evaluating a vendor's government market presence. Civic IQ provides detailed side-by-side analysis across all dimensions.
ALLIED CONTROLS serves 6 government agencies, while JOHNSON SUPPLY serves 16. JOHNSON SUPPLY has broader agency reach. Agency reach is a key indicator of a vendor's ability to navigate government procurement processes.
ALLIED CONTROLS operates in 4 states, while JOHNSON SUPPLY covers 4 states. both vendors equally has broader geographic coverage. Geographic footprint matters for agencies evaluating vendors with regional experience and for vendors assessing competitive landscapes in specific markets.
Between them, ALLIED CONTROLS and JOHNSON SUPPLY cover 9 government procurement sectors. They directly compete in EQUIPMENT. ALLIED CONTROLS's top sectors include EQUIPMENT, Change Order, and Heaters, while JOHNSON SUPPLY focuses on SUPPLIES, Supplies, and EQUIPMENT.
See live SLED buying signals, source docs, decision-makers, contract context, and the next step into your CRM or pipeline.