Explore tax incentive agreement government contracts across South Carolina agencies. Top vendors, contract values, and procurement trends.
Track tax incentive agreement contracts
Get alerts when new tax incentive agreement contracts are awarded or existing ones approach renewal in South Carolina.
Powered by Civic IQ
Government Contract Intelligence
Civic IQ tracks government contracts, vendor relationships, and procurement trends across thousands of state & local agencies — organized by category so you can focus on your market.
Learn more about Civic IQTrusted by teams at
Contract Database
25 government contracts tracked
Authorizing a fee in lieu of tax and special source revenue credit agreement between Chester County and Chester Asphalt Terminal LLC for tax incentives and joint county industrial park creation.
Orangeburg County is considering a First Amendment to the Fee in Lieu of Tax and Incentive Agreement with SR Cordova, LLC.
Orangeburg County considers a first amendment to the tax incentive agreement with SR Cordova, LLC, indicating potential adjustments to financial terms or project scope.
Marlboro County is considering a Fee-in-Lieu of AD VALOREM Taxes agreement for Project Hush, to provide tax incentives and revenue credits for a project in the County, with Ordinance # 869.
Marlboro County is considering a Fee-in-Lieu of AD VALOREM Taxes Agreement for Project Cloud, a company known to the County as Sponsor, to provide tax incentives and revenue credits for a project in the County, with Ordinance # 860.
20 more contracts available
Track expirations and renewals for all tax incentive agreement contracts in South Carolina.
Top Vendors
Vendors with the most tax incentive agreement contracts across South Carolina agencies.
Top Agencies
Government agencies with the highest tax incentive agreement contract activity.
Frequently Asked Questions
Civic IQ tracks 25 tax incentive agreement government contracts across 14 agencies in South Carolina representing $66.9M in total contract value. These contracts span 10 vendors and cover service agreements, technology implementations, infrastructure projects, and procurement awards. Contract details including amounts, terms, and renewal dates are updated as new data becomes available.
The leading vendors with tax incentive agreement government contracts in South Carolina include: SR CORDOVA (3 contracts); DAK AMERICAS (2 contracts); PEE DEE ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE (2 contracts); PROJECT LINE (2 contracts); RED DIAMOND (2 contracts). Tracking vendor contract wins, values, and agency relationships helps you understand the competitive landscape — whether you're evaluating vendors as an agency buyer or positioning against incumbents as a competitor.
The most active South Carolina government agencies procuring tax incentive agreement are: Lancaster County (3 contracts); Marion County (3 contracts); Darlington County (2 contracts); Dillon County (2 contracts); Calhoun County (2 contracts). Each agency manages its own procurement process and vendor relationships. Understanding which agencies are the largest buyers helps vendors prioritize outreach and tailor their proposals to specific agency needs.
Civic IQ aggregates tax incentive agreement contract data from 14 South Carolina government agencies into a single searchable database. You can browse contracts by agency, vendor, value, status, and renewal date. Beyond active contracts, Civic IQ also tracks pre-RFP signals from board meetings and budget discussions — surfacing tax incentive agreement opportunities 6–18 months before formal solicitations go live.
Based on tracked contract data, the average tax incentive agreement government contract in South Carolina is valued at approximately $2.7M, with 25 contracts totaling $66.9M. Individual contract values vary significantly depending on scope, agency size, and contract duration. Detailed value breakdowns by agency and vendor are available on Civic IQ.
Beyond tax incentive agreement, other active government contract categories in South Carolina include PROFESSIONAL_SERVICES, Service, OTHER, CONSTRUCTION, and Construction. Agencies often procure across multiple categories simultaneously — a city upgrading its IT infrastructure may also issue contracts for professional services, facilities maintenance, and cybersecurity. Tracking related categories helps you identify cross-selling opportunities and understand the full procurement landscape.
See live SLED buying signals, source docs, decision-makers, contract context, and the next step into your CRM or pipeline.