Explore food service government contracts across South Carolina agencies. Top vendors, contract values, and procurement trends.
Track food service contracts
Get alerts when new food service contracts are awarded or existing ones approach renewal in South Carolina.
Powered by Civic IQ
Government Contract Intelligence
Civic IQ tracks government contracts, vendor relationships, and procurement trends across thousands of state & local agencies — organized by category so you can focus on your market.
Learn more about Civic IQTrusted by teams at
Contract Database
63 government contracts tracked
Newberry County is considering a 4-year contract with Victus Food Service to manage inmate food services, aiming for higher quality and cost-effectiveness. Initial price scale (A) will remain in effect until June 30, 2026, followed by scale B with a meal price increase from $2.27 to $2.87.
Approval for food service contract is to Victus Food Service at an estimated cost of $464,351.84 from the General Fund.
Victus Food Service is being considered to be awarded a contract for providing food service at the W. Glenn Campbell Detention Center. The detention center offers three meals per day to an average inmate population of approximately 130-200 individuals. This contract is estimated to be $464,351.84 from General Fund.
Victus Food Service awarded $464,351.84 bid for food service at W. Glenn Campbell Detention Center from the General Fund.
Hampton County School District is evaluating bids for a Food Service Management contract. The committee is in the process of selecting a vendor to manage the district's food service operations.
58 more contracts available
Track expirations and renewals for all food service contracts in South Carolina.
Top Vendors
Vendors with the most food service contracts across South Carolina agencies.
Top Agencies
Government agencies with the highest food service contract activity.
Frequently Asked Questions
Civic IQ tracks 63 food service government contracts across 19 agencies in South Carolina representing $1.9M in total contract value. These contracts span 10 vendors and cover service agreements, technology implementations, infrastructure projects, and procurement awards. Contract details including amounts, terms, and renewal dates are updated as new data becomes available.
The leading vendors with food service government contracts in South Carolina include: CHARTWELLS INC. (5 contracts); VICTUS FOOD (4 contracts); GOOD SOURCE (3 contracts); IFH (3 contracts); NATIONAL FOOD (3 contracts). Tracking vendor contract wins, values, and agency relationships helps you understand the competitive landscape — whether you're evaluating vendors as an agency buyer or positioning against incumbents as a competitor.
The most active South Carolina government agencies procuring food service are: Horry County (33 contracts); Darlington County (5 contracts); Jasper County School District (3 contracts); York School District 3 (2 contracts); York School District 1 (2 contracts). Each agency manages its own procurement process and vendor relationships. Understanding which agencies are the largest buyers helps vendors prioritize outreach and tailor their proposals to specific agency needs.
Civic IQ aggregates food service contract data from 19 South Carolina government agencies into a single searchable database. You can browse contracts by agency, vendor, value, status, and renewal date. Beyond active contracts, Civic IQ also tracks pre-RFP signals from board meetings and budget discussions — surfacing food service opportunities 6–18 months before formal solicitations go live.
Based on tracked contract data, the average food service government contract in South Carolina is valued at approximately $31K, with 63 contracts totaling $1.9M. Individual contract values vary significantly depending on scope, agency size, and contract duration. Detailed value breakdowns by agency and vendor are available on Civic IQ.
Beyond food service, other active government contract categories in South Carolina include PROFESSIONAL_SERVICES, Service, OTHER, CONSTRUCTION, and Construction. Agencies often procure across multiple categories simultaneously — a city upgrading its IT infrastructure may also issue contracts for professional services, facilities maintenance, and cybersecurity. Tracking related categories helps you identify cross-selling opportunities and understand the full procurement landscape.
See live SLED buying signals, source docs, decision-makers, contract context, and the next step into your CRM or pipeline.