Explore economic development government contracts across South Carolina agencies. Top vendors, contract values, and procurement trends.
Track economic development contracts
Get alerts when new economic development contracts are awarded or existing ones approach renewal in South Carolina.
Powered by Civic IQ
Government Contract Intelligence
Civic IQ tracks government contracts, vendor relationships, and procurement trends across thousands of state & local agencies — organized by category so you can focus on your market.
Learn more about Civic IQTrusted by teams at
Contract Database
66 government contracts tracked
TTI Consumer Power Tools, Inc. is investing $51 million in economic development, creating 54 jobs with average pay of $53/hour. TTI will get 5 year investment extension
Spartanburg County is considering a Special Source Credit Agreement with Lat Purser & Associates, Inc. that provides incentives and sets the stage to pay for infrastructure credits.
Spartanburg County is considering a Fee In Lieu of Tax agreement with Project Governor, subject to certain conditions, to authorize execution and delivery.
ZF Chassis Systems Duncan, LLC, formerly known as Project Goldfinch, is slated for a Fee In Lieu of Tax agreement. The agreement may authorize the execution and delivery of a Special Source Credit, but requires additional County action.
Execution and Delivery of a Fee In Lieu of Tax and Special Source Credit Agreement by and Between Colleton County, South Carolina and Banks Construction Company with respect to certain Economic Development Property in the County.
61 more contracts available
Track expirations and renewals for all economic development contracts in South Carolina.
Top Vendors
Vendors with the most economic development contracts across South Carolina agencies.
Top Agencies
Government agencies with the highest economic development contract activity.
Frequently Asked Questions
Civic IQ tracks 66 economic development government contracts across 26 agencies in South Carolina representing $281.3M in total contract value. These contracts span 10 vendors and cover service agreements, technology implementations, infrastructure projects, and procurement awards. Contract details including amounts, terms, and renewal dates are updated as new data becomes available.
The leading vendors with economic development government contracts in South Carolina include: PROJECT BLACK JACK (3 contracts); ROCKBERG (3 contracts); KEER AMERICA (2 contracts); PALMETTO PLASTICS INNOVATIONS (2 contracts); PROJECT BEAVER (2 contracts). Tracking vendor contract wins, values, and agency relationships helps you understand the competitive landscape — whether you're evaluating vendors as an agency buyer or positioning against incumbents as a competitor.
The most active South Carolina government agencies procuring economic development are: Anderson County (12 contracts); Darlington County (7 contracts); Greenwood County (6 contracts); Kershaw County (4 contracts); Jasper County (4 contracts). Each agency manages its own procurement process and vendor relationships. Understanding which agencies are the largest buyers helps vendors prioritize outreach and tailor their proposals to specific agency needs.
Civic IQ aggregates economic development contract data from 26 South Carolina government agencies into a single searchable database. You can browse contracts by agency, vendor, value, status, and renewal date. Beyond active contracts, Civic IQ also tracks pre-RFP signals from board meetings and budget discussions — surfacing economic development opportunities 6–18 months before formal solicitations go live.
Based on tracked contract data, the average economic development government contract in South Carolina is valued at approximately $4.3M, with 66 contracts totaling $281.3M. Individual contract values vary significantly depending on scope, agency size, and contract duration. Detailed value breakdowns by agency and vendor are available on Civic IQ.
Beyond economic development, other active government contract categories in South Carolina include PROFESSIONAL_SERVICES, Service, OTHER, CONSTRUCTION, and Construction. Agencies often procure across multiple categories simultaneously — a city upgrading its IT infrastructure may also issue contracts for professional services, facilities maintenance, and cybersecurity. Tracking related categories helps you identify cross-selling opportunities and understand the full procurement landscape.
See live SLED buying signals, source docs, decision-makers, contract context, and the next step into your CRM or pipeline.