Union Public Utility District Board Meeting Agenda Packet May 2026
Ongoing Litigation Counsel Costs for Hatfield v. UPUD
Trusted by teams at
Description
Union Public Utility District continues its engagement with Best, Best & Krieger LLP for legal representation in Hatfield v. UPUD, with cumulative billings of $278,364.32 through April 2026. The firm has provided 767.52 hours of legal services over the period from February 2023 through April 2026.
Contract Details
Contract Amount
$278,364.32 (cumulative through April 2026)
Vendor
BEST, BEST & KRIEGER LLP
Agency
Union Pub Utility District, CA
Contract Type
LEGAL
Document Date
May 18, 2026
Contract Term
February 2023 – April 2026 (billing period shown)
Renewal Info
No explicit term or renewal provisions are stated; services appear to be provided on an ongoing, hourly-billed basis for the duration of the Hatfield v. UPUD case.
More from BEST, BEST & KRIEGER LLP
Related Contracts
Mountain Area Regional Transit Authority Board Meeting Agenda Packet May 2026
ONGOINGCity of San Jacinto Council Meeting Agenda May 2026
RECOMMENDEDRowland Water District Board of Directors Regular Meeting Agenda April 2026
ONGOINGRowland Water District Board Meeting Minutes March 2026
ONGOINGSanta Fe Irrigation District Board of Directors Meeting Agenda Packet January 2026
ONGOINGMore from Union Pub Utility District
Union Public Utility District Board Meeting Agenda Packet May 2026
Union Public Utility District Agenda Packet 2026-05-18
Union Public Utility District Agenda Packet 2026-05-18
Union Public Utility District Agenda Packet 2026-05-18
Union Public Utility District Agenda Packet 2026-05-18
Want to learn more?
Get alerts on contract renewals, new awards, and vendor activity.
Bring us your territory.
We'll show you what is forming.
See live SLED buying signals, source docs, decision-makers, contract context, and the next step into your CRM or pipeline.